Gardner M J, Osmond C
Stat Med. 1984 Apr-Jun;3(2):113-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030205.
A comparison is made of indices used for assessing trends in mortality rates over time, and results for four types of cancer are used as examples. The approaches contrasted as measures of change over calendar years of time are the use of crude death rates, standardized death rates (both direct and indirect approaches) and period effects estimated from an age-period-cohort model (including and excluding the cohort factor). The use of these indices is also compared with examination of the original age-specific rates. Similar analyses are made of the equivalent indices for examining changes between different birth cohorts over time. Submodels of the age-period-cohort model are shown to be algebraically and empirically related to age-standardized indices. The use of the full model, as contrasted to standardization methods, can result in important modifications to the interpretation in some cases. However, there are difficulties with this approach, as with all models, if applied uncritically. It is a wise precaution to examine the age-specific rates in each instance to ensure that any summary index is appropriate.
本文对用于评估死亡率随时间变化趋势的指标进行了比较,并以四种癌症的结果为例。作为历年时间变化量度的对比方法,包括使用粗死亡率、标准化死亡率(直接法和间接法)以及从年龄-时期-队列模型估计的时期效应(包括和不包括队列因素)。还将这些指标的使用与原始年龄别死亡率的检查进行了比较。对用于检查不同出生队列随时间变化的等效指标进行了类似分析。年龄-时期-队列模型的子模型在代数和经验上与年龄标准化指标相关。与标准化方法相比,使用完整模型在某些情况下可能会对解释产生重要修改。然而,与所有模型一样,如果不加批判地应用,这种方法也存在困难。明智的预防措施是在每种情况下检查年龄别死亡率,以确保任何汇总指标都是合适的。