Suppr超能文献

[食物成分引起的荨麻疹皮肤和黏膜的过敏及类过敏反应,特别提及食物与放射变应原吸附试验]

[Allergic and pseudoallergic reactions of the urticaria skin and mucous membranes due to food components with special reference to food and RAST].

作者信息

Illig L, Paul E

出版信息

Z Hautkr. 1984 Jun 15;59(12):793-813.

PMID:6464526
Abstract

Among 1.000 consecutive cases of urticaria with suspicious food history and positive oral exposition, 12 patients showed an acute recurrent course. The result of the Prick or rub test was mainly positive in analogy, the RAST later determined in 5 of these patients remained four times "false negative" to the rub test in 4 of 5 allergens. Many of these patients complained of typical mucosal prodromes immediately on oral exposition, which are apparently pathognonomic of food allergy. In another 13 patients, the clinical reaction was limited to oral symptoms without generalized urticaria, in spite of corresponding history and skin tests; therefore, it was regarded as "forme fruste anaphylaxis". In these cases RAST was performed together with the Prick or rub test; seven times it corresponded with the oral exposition, five times it remained negative. In correspondence with the Prick test it was five times positive and two times negative; it remained "false negative" to 9 allergens. Remarkable in this group was the coincidence of positive apple RAST and strongly positive birch pollen allergy in the form of rhinitic or asthmatic symptoms and atopy. Among 72 patients with chronically-recurrent urticaria and no suspicious history, however, there was only one case of nutritive allergy demonstrated by means of elimination and provocation diet and a subsequent "super meal". On the other hand, pseudoallergic intolerance reactions (of the aspirin type) to food additives were demonstrated in 14 out of 300 patients with chronic urticaria my means of systematic oral provocation. Therefore, in cases of chronic urticaria with no suspicious history, there is no much use in searching for a nutritive allergen by means of elimination or provocation diet, in contrast to the intolerance diagnosis by certain "test batteries". In total, the rate of secured food allergies in patients with urticaria (without "forme fruste anaphylaxis") was approximately 1.5%, the rate of pseudoallergic reactions to food additives was 4.7%. Taking together all cases, an involvement of causative or partly causative food components was demonstrated in 8.6%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

在1000例有可疑食物史且口服激发试验呈阳性的荨麻疹连续病例中,12例呈现急性复发病程。点刺或划痕试验结果大多呈阳性,类似地,随后对其中5例患者进行的放射性变应原吸附试验(RAST)在5种变应原中的4种上,相对于划痕试验有4次“假阴性”。这些患者中有许多在口服激发后立即出现典型的黏膜前驱症状,这显然是食物过敏的特征性表现。另外13例患者,尽管有相应病史和皮肤试验,但临床反应仅限于口腔症状,无全身性荨麻疹,因此被视为“顿挫型过敏反应”。在这些病例中,RAST与点刺或划痕试验同时进行;7次与口服激发试验结果相符,5次呈阴性。与点刺试验相符的情况是5次阳性、2次阴性;对9种变应原呈“假阴性”。该组中值得注意的是,苹果RAST阳性与以鼻炎或哮喘症状及特应性表现的强烈桦树花粉过敏同时存在。然而,在72例慢性复发性荨麻疹且无可疑病史的患者中,通过排除和激发饮食及随后的“强化餐”仅证实1例营养性过敏。另一方面,通过系统性口服激发试验,在300例慢性荨麻疹患者中有14例显示对食品添加剂有假过敏不耐受反应(阿司匹林型)。因此,对于无可疑病史的慢性荨麻疹病例,通过排除或激发饮食寻找营养性变应原用处不大,这与通过某些“试验组合”进行不耐受诊断形成对比。总体而言,荨麻疹患者(无“顿挫型过敏反应”)中确诊食物过敏的比例约为1.5%,对食品添加剂假过敏反应的比例为4.7%。综合所有病例,8.6%的病例显示有致病或部分致病的食物成分参与。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验