Suppr超能文献

甜味剂:消费者对茶的接受度

Sweeteners: consumer acceptance in tea.

作者信息

Sprowl D J, Ehrcke L A

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1984 Sep;84(9):1020-2.

PMID:6470371
Abstract

Sucrose, fructose, aspartame, and saccharin were compared for consumer preference, aftertaste, and cost to determine acceptability of the sweeteners. A 23-member taste panel evaluated tea samples for preference and aftertaste. Mean retail cost of the sweeteners were calculated and adjusted to take sweetening power into consideration. Sucrose was the least expensive and most preferred sweetener. No significant difference in preference for fructose and aspartame was found, but both sweeteners were rated significantly lower than sucrose. Saccharin was the most disliked sweetener. Fructose was the most expensive sweetener and aspartame the next most expensive. Scores for aftertaste followed the same pattern as those for preference. Thus, a strong, unpleasant aftertaste seems to be associated with a dislike for a sweetener. From the results of this study, it seems that there is no completely acceptable low-calorie substitute for sucrose available to consumers.

摘要

对蔗糖、果糖、阿斯巴甜和糖精在消费者偏好、余味和成本方面进行了比较,以确定这些甜味剂的可接受性。一个由23名成员组成的味觉小组对茶样的偏好和余味进行了评估。计算了甜味剂的平均零售成本,并考虑到甜味能力进行了调整。蔗糖是最便宜且最受青睐的甜味剂。果糖和阿斯巴甜在偏好上没有显著差异,但这两种甜味剂的评分均显著低于蔗糖。糖精是最不受欢迎的甜味剂。果糖是最昂贵的甜味剂,阿斯巴甜次之。余味得分与偏好得分呈现相同模式。因此,强烈、令人不悦的余味似乎与对甜味剂的厌恶有关。从这项研究的结果来看,消费者似乎没有完全可接受的蔗糖低热量替代品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验