Poulson C L
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Aug;38(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90021-3.
The numerous mechanisms of behavior change in infant development are sometimes difficult to distinguish. Although it is agreed that elicitation and reinforcement both influence infant learning, the distinction between these two learning mechanisms was clarified in response to K. Bloom's (1984, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 93-102) commentary. The theoretical and methodological assumptions of an functional analysis of infant behavior were made explicit in the context of the C. L. Poulson study (1983, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 471-489). The rationale for the use of DRO schedules to control for elicitation effects of continuous reinforcement and the inadequacy of noncontingent schedules for this purpose were also discussed.
婴儿发育过程中行为变化的众多机制有时难以区分。尽管人们一致认为诱发和强化都会影响婴儿的学习，但针对K. 布鲁姆（1984年，《实验儿童心理学杂志》，第38卷，第93 - 102页）的评论，这两种学习机制之间的区别得到了澄清。在C. L. 保尔森的研究（1983年，《实验儿童心理学杂志》，第36卷，第471 - 489页）背景下，婴儿行为功能分析的理论和方法假设被明确阐述。还讨论了使用消退法时间表来控制连续强化的诱发效应的基本原理，以及非偶然时间表在此目的上的不足之处。
