Kalveram K J, Forck G
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1984 May-Jun;12(3):189-92.
We describe the case of a patient who developed distinct allergic reactions after the ingestion of commercially available "pollen food", while according to the history there had been no previous complaints to aero-pollen. By both in vivo as well as in vitro testing a simultaneous sensitivity to grass, tree and weed pollen, as well as to the main components of "pollen food" rock rose and viper buglows pollen could be proven. With the help of RAST-inhibition, cross-reactions between the different pollen allergens were traceable. In the pollen season after the allergic incident, the patient developed pollinosis symptoms for the first time, which intensified in the following season. On these grounds, we believe that (1) the repeated ingestion of "pollen food" resulted in a sensitization against its allergens and, due to the cross-reactions, against aero pollen allergens as well and that (2) an "allergic breakthrough" caused the manifestation of pollinosis symptoms.
一名患者在摄入市售“花粉食品”后出现了明显的过敏反应,而根据病史,此前并无对气传花粉的相关投诉。通过体内和体外测试,均证实该患者对禾本科、树木和杂草花粉以及“花粉食品”的主要成分岩蔷薇和蝰蛇紫草花粉同时敏感。借助放射变应原吸附试验抑制法,可追踪到不同花粉过敏原之间的交叉反应。在过敏事件后的花粉季节,该患者首次出现花粉症症状,并在随后的季节中加重。基于这些情况,我们认为:(1)反复摄入“花粉食品”导致了对其过敏原的致敏,并且由于交叉反应,也导致了对气传花粉过敏原的致敏;(2)一次“过敏突破”引发了花粉症症状的显现。