Callihan D R, Migneault P C, Nolte F S
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Oct;82(4):465-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/82.4.465.
In a retrospective study of 1,143 blood culture sets, BACTEC aerobic (6B) and osmotically stabilized (8B) media were compared individually with resin-containing (16B) medium for the isolation of bacteria from the blood of patients receiving antimicrobial therapy. The 16B medium was found to detect significantly more positive cultures than either 6B (P less than 0.01) or 8B (P less than 0.001). For 22 of 25 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from 18 patients, 16B medium provided the only means of recovery. All but one of these patients were receiving appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and 16 of 18 had a previous blood culture set positive for S. aureus that did not include a 16B bottle. There was no evidence of a change in antimicrobial therapy in response to a 16B positive culture in these patients. No significant increase in the recovery of other gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria or decrease in the time to radiometric detection of positive cultures as a result of using 16B medium was noted.
在一项对1143份血培养标本的回顾性研究中,将BACTEC需氧(6B)培养基和渗透稳定(8B)培养基分别与含树脂(16B)培养基进行比较,以从接受抗菌治疗的患者血液中分离细菌。结果发现,16B培养基检测到的阳性培养物明显多于6B培养基(P<0.01)或8B培养基(P<0.001)。对于来自18名患者的25株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中的22株,16B培养基是唯一的分离手段。除1名患者外,所有这些患者均接受了适当的抗菌治疗,18名患者中有16名之前的血培养标本中金黄色葡萄球菌呈阳性,但其中未包括16B瓶。在这些患者中,没有证据表明因16B阳性培养结果而改变了抗菌治疗方案。使用16B培养基后,未发现其他革兰氏阳性或革兰氏阴性细菌的分离率显著增加,也未发现阳性培养物的放射性检测时间缩短。