Uhlemann M R, Lee D Y, Hett G G
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Jul;40(4):1111-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198407)40:4<1111::aid-jclp2270400444>3.0.co;2-r.
Examined the relationship between preference for major counseling orientations and perception of counselor behavior in theoretically derived counseling interviews. Seventy-seven undergraduate students viewed demonstration interviews by Rogers and Lazarus, rated the counselor behavior on the Counselor Rating Form, and were assessed in their endorsement of seven major counseling orientations. A regression analysis performed on the preference scores for seven counseling orientations (predictors) in response to the counselor perception scores on the Counselor Rating Form showed a significant relationship only between the client-centered orientation and Rogers. Lazarus was not predicted from any of the seven orientations. Additional analysis of the Counselor Rating Form data revealed that Lazarus was perceived as more expert, attractive, and trustworthy than Rogers. The results are discussed in relation to previous studies.
研究了在理论推导的咨询访谈中，对主要咨询取向的偏好与对咨询师行为的认知之间的关系。77名本科生观看了罗杰斯和拉扎勒斯的示范访谈，在咨询师评分表上对咨询师行为进行评分，并对他们对七种主要咨询取向的认同程度进行评估。对七种咨询取向（预测变量）的偏好分数与咨询师评分表上的咨询师认知分数进行回归分析，结果显示只有以客户为中心的取向与罗杰斯之间存在显著关系。七种取向中的任何一种都无法预测拉扎勒斯。对咨询师评分表数据的进一步分析表明，拉扎勒斯被认为比罗杰斯更专业、更有吸引力、更值得信赖。结合之前的研究对结果进行了讨论。
