McMillan D E, Wenger G R
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):51-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-51.
Pigeons, trained to discriminate phencyclidine from saline under a procedure requiring the bird to track the location of a color, received cumulative doses of phencyclidine, pentobarbital, or d-amphetamine with a variety of schedules of reinforcement in effect (across phases). When the same second-order schedules were used to reinforce responding after either saline or phencyclidine administration, stimulus control by phencyclidine did not depend on the schedule parameter. When different second-order schedules were used that biased responding toward the phencyclidine-correlated key color, pigeons responded on the phencyclidine-correlated key at lower doses of phencyclidine and pentobarbital than when the second-order schedule biased responding toward the saline key color. A similar but less marked effect was obtained with d-amphetamine. Attempts to produce bias by changing reinforcement magnitude (duration of food availability) were less successful. A signal-detection analysis of dose-effect curves for phencyclidine under two of the second-order schedules employed suggested that at low doses of phencyclidine, response bias is a major determinant of responding. As doses were increased, position preferences occurred and response bias decreased; at higher doses both response bias and position preference decreased and discriminability increased. With low doses of pentobarbital, responding again was biased but increasing doses produced position preference with only small increases in discriminability. At low doses of d-amphetamine responding also was biased, but bias did not decrease consistently with dose nor did discriminability increase. These experiments suggest that the schedule of reinforcement can be used to bias responding toward or away from making the drug-correlated response in drug discrimination experiments, and that signal-detection analysis and analysis of responding at a position can be used to separate the discriminability of the drug state from other effects of the drug on responding.
鸽子经过训练,在一种要求鸟类追踪颜色位置的程序下,能够区分苯环己哌啶和生理盐水。在不同的强化程序(跨阶段)下,给鸽子累积注射苯环己哌啶、戊巴比妥或右旋苯丙胺。当使用相同的二阶程序在注射生理盐水或苯环己哌啶后强化反应时,苯环己哌啶的刺激控制并不取决于程序参数。当使用不同的二阶程序使反应偏向与苯环己哌啶相关的关键颜色时,与二阶程序使反应偏向与生理盐水相关的关键颜色相比,鸽子在较低剂量的苯环己哌啶和戊巴比妥作用下就会对与苯环己哌啶相关的按键做出反应。右旋苯丙胺也有类似但不太明显的效果。通过改变强化幅度(食物可得时间)来产生偏向的尝试不太成功。对所采用的两个二阶程序下苯环己哌啶剂量效应曲线的信号检测分析表明,在低剂量的苯环己哌啶作用下,反应偏向是反应的主要决定因素。随着剂量增加,出现位置偏好且反应偏向降低;在较高剂量下,反应偏向和位置偏好都降低,辨别力增加。低剂量的戊巴比妥作用下,反应再次出现偏向,但剂量增加会产生位置偏好,辨别力仅略有增加。低剂量的右旋苯丙胺作用下,反应也有偏向,但偏向并不随剂量一致降低,辨别力也没有增加。这些实验表明,在药物辨别实验中,强化程序可用于使反应偏向或远离做出与药物相关的反应,并且信号检测分析和位置反应分析可用于将药物状态的辨别力与药物对反应的其他影响区分开来。