Hahn A, Anderson S D, Morton A R, Black J L, Fitch K D
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Oct;130(4):575-9. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.4.575.
To compare the importance of water loss with heat loss in the mechanism of exercise-induced asthma (EIA), we conditioned the air inspired during exercise to the same water content (Wi) while changing its temperature (Ti), and vice versa. We calculated separately the amount of heat and water required to bring the inspired air to alveolar conditions. Ten asthmatics ran for 8 min on 4 occasions in an environmental chamber. The air was conditioned to a Ti of 9 to 10 degrees C or 35 degrees C, with a Wi of 9 to 10 mg H2OL-1. The airway response to exercise was not significantly different when Ti varied by 25 degrees C, but the amount of water required to saturate the inspired air remained the same. However, the amount of heat required was significantly greater with cooler air (p less than 0.005). We conclude that it is the osmotic and not the cooling effects induced by the vaporization of water that is the more important factor determining EIA.
为比较水分流失与热量流失在运动诱发哮喘(EIA)机制中的重要性,我们在改变吸入空气温度(Ti)的同时,将运动期间吸入空气的含水量调节至相同水平(Wi),反之亦然。我们分别计算了将吸入空气调节至肺泡条件所需的热量和水量。10名哮喘患者在环境舱内进行了4次8分钟的跑步。空气被调节至Ti为9至10摄氏度或35摄氏度,Wi为9至10毫克H2O·L-1。当Ti变化25摄氏度时,气道对运动的反应无显著差异,但使吸入空气饱和所需的水量保持不变。然而,较冷空气所需的热量显著更多(p<0.005)。我们得出结论,决定EIA的更重要因素是水蒸发引起的渗透作用而非冷却作用。