Suppr超能文献

在用肥皂产品的微生物菌群。

Microbial flora of in-use soap products.

作者信息

McBride M E

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):338-41. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.338-341.1984.

Abstract

A comparison has been made of the in-use bacterial load of two bar soaps with and without antibacterials and two liquid soaps in five different locations over a 1-week period. Of the 25 samples taken from each soap, 92 to 96% of samples from bar soaps were culture positive as compared to 8% of those from liquid soaps. Bacterial populations ranged from 0 to 3.8 log CFU per sample for bar soaps and from 0 to 2.0 log CFU per sample for liquid soaps. The mean bacterial populations per sample were 1.96 and 2.47 log CFU for the two bar soaps, and 0.08 and 0.12 log CFU for the two liquid soaps. The difference in bacterial population between bar soaps and liquid soaps was statistically significant (P = 0.005). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated on three occasions from bar soaps but not from liquid soaps. S. aureus was isolated twice from the exterior of the plastic dispensers of liquid soap but not from the soap itself. Gram-negative bacteria were cultured only from soaps containing antibacterials. Bacterial populations on bar soaps were not high compared with bacterial populations on hands, and the flora was continually changing without evidence of a carrier state.

摘要

在为期1周的时间里,对两种含抗菌剂和不含抗菌剂的条形肥皂以及两种液体肥皂在五个不同地点的使用中细菌载量进行了比较。从每种肥皂中采集的25个样本中,条形肥皂样本的92%至96%培养呈阳性,而液体肥皂样本的这一比例为8%。条形肥皂每个样本的细菌数量范围为0至3.8 log CFU,液体肥皂每个样本的细菌数量范围为0至2.0 log CFU。两种条形肥皂每个样本的平均细菌数量分别为1.96和2.47 log CFU,两种液体肥皂的平均细菌数量分别为0.08和0.12 log CFU。条形肥皂和液体肥皂之间的细菌数量差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.005)。金黄色葡萄球菌在条形肥皂中分离出3次,但在液体肥皂中未分离出。金黄色葡萄球菌在液体肥皂塑料分配器外部分离出2次,但未从肥皂本身分离出。革兰氏阴性菌仅从含抗菌剂的肥皂中培养出。与手上的细菌数量相比,条形肥皂上的细菌数量并不高,而且菌群不断变化,没有携带状态的证据。

相似文献

1
Microbial flora of in-use soap products.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):338-41. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.338-341.1984.
2
Bacterial hand contamination and transfer after use of contaminated bulk-soap-refillable dispensers.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(9):2898-904. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02632-10. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
3
Contamination of bar soaps under "in-use" conditions.
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 1984 Jul;5(4-5):1-14.
4
Microbial contamination of "in use" bar soap in dental clinics.
Indian J Dent Res. 2006 Apr-Jun;17(2):70-3. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.29888.
5
The importance of soap selection for routine hand hygiene in hospital.
J Hyg (Lond). 1981 Jun;86(3):275-83. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400069023.
6
Effects of an antibacterial soap on the ecology of aerobic bacterial flora of human skin.
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):551-6. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.551-556.1975.
8
A loophole in soap dispensers mediates contamination with Gram-negative bacteria.
Microbiologyopen. 2023 Oct;12(5):e1384. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1384.
9
Handwashing and antiseptic-containing soaps in hospital.
J Clin Pathol. 1979 Jul;32(7):732-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.7.732.
10
Bar soap and liquid soap.
JAMA. 1984;251(24):3222-3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
BACTERIOLOGICAL STUDIES RELATING TO HANDWASHING. 1. THE INABILITY OF SOAP BARS TO TRANSMIT BACTERIA.
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1965 Jun;55(6):915-22. doi: 10.2105/ajph.55.6.915.
2
Pseudobacteremia attributed to contamination of povidone-iodine with Pseudomonas cepacia.
Ann Intern Med. 1981 Jul;95(1):32-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-95-1-32.
3
Nosocomial Pseudomonas cepacia infection associated with chlorhexidine contamination.
Am J Med. 1982 Aug;73(2):183-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90176-0.
4
Prolonged survival of Serratia marcescens in chlorhexidine.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Dec;42(6):1093-102. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.6.1093-1102.1981.
6
Serratia marcescens contaminated disinfectants.
Lancet. 1981 Mar 28;1(8222):727. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92007-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验