Suppr超能文献

旋转性集合和旋转性融合的客观与主观评估。

Objective and subjective evaluation of cyclovergence and cyclofusion.

作者信息

Herzau V, Joos-Kratsch E

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug 15;58(1):85-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00140903.

Abstract

There is a marked dispersion in the measured results of the angle formed by the intersection of the optic disc-center-meridian with the horizontal meridian, when the cycloposition of the eyes is determined through evaluation of the position of the optic disc (with fundus photographs or indirectly with perimetry). Values of the angle ranging from 0 degree at 12 degrees are still physiological. Inside this dispersion, individual right-left asymmetries of less than 4 degrees with photography and of less than 7 degrees with monocular perimetry are still normal as well. Positional differences of less than 4 degrees in sequential testings are also in a physiological range. The motor behaviour of both eyes during cyclofusion is evaluated by means of a perimetrical analysis of the blind spot at the phase-difference haploscope. Various sensory and motor adaptation phenomena are detected by comparing objective and subjective findings in patients with cyclotropia. These phenomena are discussed in detail.

摘要

当通过评估视盘位置(使用眼底照片或间接通过视野检查)来确定眼睛的旋转位置时,视盘中心子午线与水平子午线相交形成的角度测量结果存在明显离散。该角度值在0度至12度之间仍属生理范围。在这种离散范围内,通过摄影测量时个体左右不对称小于4度以及通过单眼视野检查时小于7度仍属正常。连续测试中位置差异小于4度也处于生理范围内。双眼在旋转融合过程中的运动行为通过相差检眼镜对视乳头盲点进行视野分析来评估。通过比较旋转斜视患者的客观和主观结果,检测到各种感觉和运动适应现象。对这些现象进行了详细讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验