Dubois J, Sénécal J, Giraud J R, Grall J Y, Defawe G, Roussey M, Morellec J, Le Marec B
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1984;13(5):491-7.
Having studied perinatal mortality in Ille-et-Vilaine from 1972 onwards, the authors have come to realise how out of date the present method of working out perinatal mortality is because it only takes account of late intra-uterine death and early neonatal mortality of infants weighing at least 1 kilogram. The old method does not take notice of the changes that have occurred because of the progress that has taken place in obstetrics and neonatology such as the survival of an increasing number of newborn that weigh less than 1,000 grams or of the fact that the distinction between early and late neonatal death seems to be less and less valid. It does not add up to the total of "lost pregnancies". Furthermore, it does not make it possible to compare our figures with those published in foreign countries. The authors therefore feel that a new definition of perinatal mortality should be made, and this should satisfy the four following requirements: It should include on the one hand all fetuses and newborn that weigh at least 500 grams and on the other hand it should include early and late mortality and even mortality that occurs after the neonatal period. It should take into account the problem of false still-births. It should take into account fetal malformations and abnormalities that have called for therapeutic abortions because they are among the principal causes of perinatal mortality. It should study all the statistics and publications on this subject.
自1972年起,作者对伊勒-维莱讷省的围产期死亡率进行了研究,他们逐渐意识到,目前计算围产期死亡率的方法已经过时,因为它只考虑了至少1千克重的婴儿的晚期宫内死亡和早期新生儿死亡。旧方法没有注意到由于产科学和新生儿学的进展而发生的变化,比如越来越多体重不足1000克的新生儿存活下来,或者早期和晚期新生儿死亡之间的区别似乎越来越站不住脚。它没有涵盖“妊娠丢失”的总数。此外,它也无法使我们的数字与国外公布的数字进行比较。因此,作者认为应该对围产期死亡率做出新的定义,这个定义应满足以下四个要求:一方面,它应包括所有体重至少500克的胎儿和新生儿;另一方面,它应包括早期和晚期死亡率,甚至新生儿期后的死亡率。它应考虑假死产的问题。它应考虑到因胎儿畸形和异常而需要治疗性流产的情况,因为它们是围产期死亡的主要原因之一。它应研究关于这个主题的所有统计数据和出版物。