Diener E, Larsen R J, Emmons R A
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Sep;47(3):580-92. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.47.3.580.
Two models of Person x Situation interaction wee examined. The first model predicts that there is a relation between personality and the situations people naturally choose to be in; the second model predicts that when there is congruence between the situation and personality, a person will experience more positive and less negative affect. These models were investigated by using mood and activity reports gathered on 3,512 occasions sampled randomly from the everyday lives of 42 subjects. Situational dimensions were related to some but not all personality variables investigated. Need for order predicted choice of typical situations and extraversion correlated with time spent recreating socially. However, it was found that individuals did not spend more time in those settings where they experienced more positive emotions nor less time in those situations where they experienced more negative affect. In terms of the affect-congruence model, several predicted relations wee found, but several others did not reach significance. The failure of the affect-congruence model to be consistently supported was probably because the affect of individuals was relatively consistent across situations. The present results suggest that although some theoretically meaningful Person x Situation interactions do occur, they are not necessarily strong or easily predictable.
研究了两种人×情境交互模型。第一种模型预测,人格与人们自然选择身处的情境之间存在关联;第二种模型预测,当情境与人格相符时,个体将体验到更多积极情绪且更少消极情绪。通过使用从42名受试者的日常生活中随机抽取的3512个样本所收集的情绪和活动报告,对这些模型进行了研究。情境维度与所调查的部分而非全部人格变量相关。秩序需求预测了典型情境的选择,外向性与社交性娱乐活动所花费的时间相关。然而,研究发现,个体不会在那些体验到更多积极情绪的情境中花费更多时间,也不会在那些体验到更多消极情绪的情境中花费更少时间。就情感相符模型而言,发现了一些预测的关系,但其他一些关系未达到显著水平。情感相符模型未能得到一致支持,可能是因为个体的情感在不同情境中相对一致。目前的结果表明,虽然一些理论上有意义 的人×情境交互确实会发生,但它们不一定强烈或易于预测。