Sianesi M, Ghirarduzzi A, Percudani M, Dell'Anna B
Am J Surg. 1984 Nov;148(5):609-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90334-9.
There is still considerable controversy among surgeons regarding the most opportune moment for surgical intervention in the case of acute cholecystitis. For this reason, 471 patients cholecystectomized for acute cholecystitis from 1970 through 1982 were studied. During the first period, there were two types of surgical intervention: during hospitalization after resolution of the acute episode, and during a second hospitalization 2 to 3 months later. During the second period, early cholecystectomy within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms became the option. Emergency operations did not reflect a surgical choice but rather conditions of necessity. The results of this study demonstrate that early cholecystectomy is preferred for a variety of reasons, the most important of these being a low incidence of positive results of bile culture in this phase, a negligible percentage of postoperative complications and mortality, and a short hospitalization period with resulting cost containment.
对于急性胆囊炎患者,外科手术干预的最佳时机在外科医生中仍存在相当大的争议。因此,对1970年至1982年间因急性胆囊炎接受胆囊切除术的471例患者进行了研究。在第一阶段,有两种手术干预方式:在急性发作缓解后的住院期间进行,以及在2至3个月后的第二次住院期间进行。在第二阶段,症状出现后72小时内进行早期胆囊切除术成为选择。急诊手术并非一种手术选择,而是必要条件。这项研究的结果表明,由于多种原因,早期胆囊切除术更受青睐,其中最重要的原因是在此阶段胆汁培养阳性结果的发生率较低、术后并发症和死亡率的百分比可忽略不计,以及住院时间短从而控制了成本。