尊严与成本效益：剖析医学伦理决策中的责任
Dignity and cost-effectiveness: analysing the responsibility for decisions in medical ethics.
作者信息
Robertson G S
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):152-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.152.
Abstract
In the operation of a health care system, defining the limits of medical care is the joint responsibility of many parties including clinicians, patients, philosophers and politicians. It is suggested that changes in the potential for prolonging life make it necessary to give doctors guidance which may have to incorporate certain features of utilitarianism, individualism and patient-autonomy.
摘要
在医疗保健系统的运作中，界定医疗保健的界限是包括临床医生、患者、哲学家和政治家在内的多方共同责任。有人认为，延长生命可能性的变化使得有必要为医生提供指导，这种指导可能必须纳入功利主义、个人主义和患者自主权的某些特征。
相似文献
1
Dignity and cost-effectiveness: analysing the responsibility for decisions in medical ethics.尊严与成本效益：剖析医学伦理决策中的责任
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):152-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.152.
2
Dignity and cost-effectiveness: a rejection of the utilitarian approach to death.尊严与成本效益：对功利主义死亡观的摒弃。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):148-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.148.
3
Dignity and death: a reply.尊严与死亡：一则回应
J Med Ethics. 1985 Jun;11(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.2.84.
4
Arresting but misleading phrases.引人注意但具误导性的表述。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):155-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.155.
5
Response to Roger W. Hunt.对罗杰·W·亨特的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1993 Mar;19(1):24-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.1.24.
6
Clinical Ethics, by A. Jonsen, M. Siegler, and W. Winslade.《临床伦理学》，作者A. 琼森、M. 西格勒和W. 温斯莱德。
J Leg Med. 1993 Jun;14(2):355-7. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510920.
7
Euthanasia: the three-in-one issue.安乐死：三位一体的问题。
Bayl Law Rev. 1975 Winter;27(1):62-7.
8
Doctors and allocation decisions: a new role in the new Medicare.医生与分配决策：新医疗保险制度中的新角色
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Fall;10(3):549-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-3-549.
9
The Appleton International Conference: Developing guidelines for decisions to forgo life-prolonging medical treatment -- Preamble, Parts I, II, III, and IV.阿普尔顿国际会议：制定放弃延长生命医疗治疗决策的指南——前言，第一、二、三及四部分
J Med Ethics. 1992 Sep;18(Suppl):S3-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.suppl.3.
10
Neither for love nor money: why doctors must not kill.无论如何都不行：医生为何绝不能杀人。
Public Interest. 1989 Winter;No. 94:25-46.
引用本文的文献
1
Utilitarianism.功利主义
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):115-6, 123. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.115.
2
Dignity and death: a reply.尊严与死亡：一则回应
J Med Ethics. 1985 Jun;11(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.2.84.
3
Surgery to quieten the yelling of a demented old man.为让一位老年痴呆患者不再大喊大叫而进行的手术。
J Med Ethics. 1987 Dec;13(4):198-200. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.4.198.
本文引用的文献
1
Dealing with the brain-damaged old--dignity before sanctity.对待脑损伤老人——尊严先于神圣。
J Med Ethics. 1982 Dec;8(4):173-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.8.4.173.
2
Sounding Board. Allowing the debilitated to die. Facing our ethical choices.
N Engl J Med. 1983 Mar 24;308(12):716-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198303243081210.
3
When to stop treatment.何时停止治疗。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Oct 8;287(6398):1056-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6398.1056.
4
Factors associated with survival and eventual cerebral status following cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后与生存及最终脑功能状态相关的因素。
Anaesthesia. 1984 Jan;39(1):39-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb09452.x.
Zotero 插件