尊严与成本效益：对功利主义死亡观的摒弃。
Dignity and cost-effectiveness: a rejection of the utilitarian approach to death.
作者信息
Brooks S A
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):148-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.148.
Abstract
Utilitarianism is commonly assumed to be the most appropriate sub-structure for medical ethics. This view is challenged. It is suggested that the utilitarian approach to euthanasia works against the patient's individual advantage and is a corrupting influence in the relationship between the physician and society. Dignity for the individual patient is not easily achieved by assessing that person's worth against the yardstick of others' needs and wishes.
摘要
功利主义通常被认为是医学伦理学最合适的子结构。这一观点受到了挑战。有人认为，功利主义的安乐死方法违背了患者的个人利益，并且对医生与社会之间的关系产生了不良影响。通过根据他人的需求和愿望来衡量一个人的价值，很难实现对个体患者尊严的维护。
相似文献
1
Dignity and cost-effectiveness: a rejection of the utilitarian approach to death.尊严与成本效益：对功利主义死亡观的摒弃。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):148-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.148.
2
Dignity and cost-effectiveness: analysing the responsibility for decisions in medical ethics.尊严与成本效益：剖析医学伦理决策中的责任
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):152-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.152.
3
Dignity and death: a reply.尊严与死亡：一则回应
J Med Ethics. 1985 Jun;11(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.2.84.
4
Arresting but misleading phrases.引人注意但具误导性的表述。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):155-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.155.
5
Euthanasia: the three-in-one issue.安乐死：三位一体的问题。
Bayl Law Rev. 1975 Winter;27(1):62-7.
6
Do-not-resuscitate orders. Time for reappraisal in long-term-care institutions.不要复苏医嘱。长期护理机构中重新评估的时机。
JAMA. 1988 Oct 14;260(14):2098-101. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.14.2098.
7
Good life, good death, and the right to die: ethical considerations for decisions at the end of life.美好的生活、安详的死亡与死亡权利：临终决策的伦理考量
J Prof Nurs. 1994 Jan-Feb;10(1):22-37. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80039-0.
8
Killing and allowing to die in medical practice.医疗实践中的杀人与听任死亡
J Med Ethics. 1984 Jun;10(2):82-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.2.82.
9
Is the patient's right to die evolving into a duty to die?: Medical decision making and ethical evaluations in health care.患者的死亡权是否正在演变成死亡义务？：医疗保健中的医疗决策与伦理评估
J Eval Clin Pract. 1997 Feb;3(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1997.tb00069.x.
10
Doctors must not kill.医生不得杀人。
J Clin Ethics. 1992 Summer;3(2):95-102.
引用本文的文献
1
From ontological to relational: A scoping review of conceptions of dignity invoked in deliberations on medically assisted death.从本体论到关系论：对医学辅助死亡审议中援引的尊严概念的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 12;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01095-z.
2
Utilitarianism.功利主义
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):115-6, 123. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.115.
3
Dignity and death: a reply.尊严与死亡：一则回应
J Med Ethics. 1985 Jun;11(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.2.84.
4
Utilitarianism.功利主义
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 May 11;290(6479):1411-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6479.1411.
本文引用的文献
1
Debate: extraordinary means and the sanctity of life.辩论：特殊手段与生命的神圣性。
J Med Ethics. 1981 Jun;7(2):74-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.7.2.74.
2
Dealing with the brain-damaged old--dignity before sanctity.对待脑损伤老人——尊严先于神圣。
J Med Ethics. 1982 Dec;8(4):173-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.8.4.173.
3
Medical ethics: some reservations.医学伦理学：一些保留意见。
J Med Ethics. 1982 Sep;8(3):117-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.8.3.117.
4
Ethical problems in the management of some severely handicapped children.一些重度残疾儿童管理中的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 1981 Sep;7(3):117-24. doi: 10.1136/jme.7.3.117.
5
Symposium: 3. Legislation is likely to create more difficulties than it resolves.专题讨论会：3. 立法可能制造出比其解决的问题更多的困难。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Mar;9(1):18-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.1.18.
6
Ethical dilemmas of brain failure in the elderly.老年人脑衰竭的伦理困境
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Dec 10;287(6407):1775-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6407.1775.
Zotero 插件