Benor D E, Notzer N, Sheehan T J, Norman G R
Med Educ. 1984 Nov;18(6):423-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01297.x.
To determine whether admission interviews could differentiate applicants on their personal qualities (such as integrity, empathy and commitment) 456 applicants from two medical schools were tested on the Defining Issues Test (DIT), which measures the amount of principled or post-conventional moral reasoning. No difference was found between the DIT scores of the accepted and the rejected applicants of the school in which the admission criteria are the traditional scholastic ones. On the other hand, a great difference was shown in the school which admits students for their personal characteristics as assessed by interviews. Yet only moderate correlation was shown between the DIT and the interview scores. Since moral reasoning is a key concept in medical professional behaviour and is correlated with clinical performance, the findings deserve special attention. A possible use of the DIT in the student selection process is discussed.
为了确定入学面试能否根据个人品质(如正直、同理心和奉献精神)区分申请人,对两所医学院的456名申请人进行了界定问题测试(DIT),该测试衡量原则性或后习俗道德推理的程度。在录取标准为传统学术标准的学校中,录取和未录取申请人的DIT分数没有差异。另一方面,在通过面试评估学生个人特点来录取学生的学校中,差异很大。然而,DIT与面试分数之间仅显示出中等程度的相关性。由于道德推理是医学专业行为的关键概念,且与临床绩效相关,这些发现值得特别关注。文中还讨论了DIT在学生选拔过程中的一种可能用途。