• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在乎生态?环境关切中的个性与性别差异。

Who cares about ecology? Personality and sex differences in environmental concern.

作者信息

Borden R J, Francis J L

出版信息

J Pers. 1978 Mar;46(1):190-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00610.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00610.x
PMID:650379
Abstract

This study was designed to identify personality factors that underlie concern for ecological-environmental problems. High and low environmental-concern individuals were given the California Psychological Inventory and were found to differ significantly on many subscales. A factor analysis of the CPI data produced four factors which closely paralleled previous CPI research findings. In conjunction with this analysis, four factorially derived scores were obtained for each individual. Comparison of high and low environmental-concern individual's factorially derived scores showed high environmental-concern persons as having stronger value orientation, person orientation, and ethical-conscientiousness, but not differing from low environmental-concern individuals in terms of independence of thought or action. Further, high environmental-concern females were found to be significantly more extraverted, "leader-types" than low environmental-concern females; while the opposite relation was obtained for males. Thus, it appears that men and women become involved with the environmental movement for different reasons, Finally, additional implications of the involvement of basic psychological individual differences in determining ecological-environmental concern were discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在确定构成对生态环境问题关注基础的人格因素。对高环境关注度和低环境关注度的个体进行了加利福尼亚心理调查表测试,结果发现他们在许多分量表上存在显著差异。对加利福尼亚心理调查表的数据进行因素分析得出了四个因素,这与之前对加利福尼亚心理调查表的研究结果非常相似。结合这一分析,为每个个体获得了四个基于因素分析得出的分数。对高环境关注度和低环境关注度个体的基于因素分析得出的分数进行比较,结果显示高环境关注度的人具有更强的价值取向、人际取向和道德责任心,但在思维或行动独立性方面与低环境关注度的个体没有差异。此外,还发现高环境关注度的女性比低环境关注度的女性明显更外向,属于“领导型”;而男性的情况则相反。因此,男性和女性参与环保运动的原因似乎不同。最后,讨论了基本心理个体差异在决定生态环境关注度方面的其他影响。

相似文献

1
Who cares about ecology? Personality and sex differences in environmental concern.谁在乎生态?环境关切中的个性与性别差异。
J Pers. 1978 Mar;46(1):190-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00610.x.
2
Communicator image and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator extraversion-introversion.沟通者形象与迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标中的外向-内向型
J Psychol. 2003 Nov;137(6):560-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980309600635.
3
Personality and sexual adjustment.人格与性适应。
Br J Psychiatry. 1971 Jun;118(547):593-608. doi: 10.1192/bjp.118.547.593.
4
Sex, politics, and personality: a multidimensional study of college students.性别、政治与个性:一项关于大学生的多维度研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 1977 Mar;6(2):105-19. doi: 10.1007/BF01541703.
5
Extraversion-introversion and spatial intelligence.外向性-内向性与空间智力。
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Aug;77(1):19-24. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.77.1.19.
6
An inventory of interpersonal style.人际风格清单。
J Pers Assess. 1973 Apr;37(2):165-73. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1973.10119847.
7
The California Psychological Inventory and the Semantic Differential dimensions.
J Gen Psychol. 1976 Jan;94(1st Half):129-34. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1976.9711598.
8
Effect of personality on magnitude-estimation scaling of complex auditory stimuli.人格对复杂听觉刺激大小估计标度的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 2):435-42. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.435.
9
Some personality correlates of the A-B therapist scale for male and female medical students.A-B治疗师量表与男女医学生某些人格特征的相关性
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Apr;34(2):519-22. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197804)34:2<519::aid-jclp2270340257>3.0.co;2-h.
10
Construct validity: person-orientation and value-orientation scales of the California Psychological Inventory.结构效度:加利福尼亚心理调查表的以人为本和以价值为导向的量表
Psychol Rep. 1978 Feb;42(1):317-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1978.42.1.317.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of the Big Five Personality Traits on Residents' Plastic Reduction Attitudes in China.五大人格特质对中国居民减少塑料态度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 9;20(10):5762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105762.
2
Environmental motivation or economic motivation? Explaining individuals' intention to carry reusable bags for shopping in China.环境动机还是经济动机?解读中国人购物时携带环保购物袋的意愿。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:972748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972748. eCollection 2022.
3
Relationships between Spirituality, Religious Fundamentalism and Environmentalism: The Mediating Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism.
宗教信仰、宗教原教旨主义与环境主义之间的关系:右翼权威主义的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013242.
4
Envy and Environmental Decision Making: The Mediating Role of Self-Control.嫉妒与环境决策:自我控制的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 6;19(2):639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020639.
5
Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis.大五人格和 HEXACO 人格特质、亲环境态度和行为:一项元分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;15(4):913-941. doi: 10.1177/1745691620903019. Epub 2020 May 8.