Ito M, Fujino T, Kurata E, Kanaya S, Fujino M, Imanishi S, Yasuda H, Ueno T
Jpn Heart J. 1978 Mar;19(2):193-203. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19.193.
With the use of bidirectional echocardiography, the isometric contraction (ICT) and relaxation times (IRT) of both ventricles were measured in 14 normal subjects (N), 6 cases with right ventricular (RV) diastolic overloading (DO), and 5 cases with RV systolic overloading (SO). The RVDO group consisted of patients with atrial septal defect of ostium secundum type who had large left-to-right shunting, and the RVSO group those with pulmonary hypertension of various origins. The mean ICT and IRT in N were 28.5 +/- 4.8 and 43.8 +/- 1.7 msec for RV, and 43.3 +/- 5.6 and 60.9 +/- 9.0 msec for left ventricle (LV), respectively. The RVDO group showed no significant change in the mean ICT and IRT of RV (29.7 +/- 4.6 and 54.3 +/- 11.8 msec, respectively), but significantly greater means of ICT and IRT of LV (58.5 +/- 9.5 and 83.6 +/- 14.1 msec, respectively. In the RVSO group, the mean ICT and IRT were 51.0 +/- 4.1 and 86.8 +/- 8.2 msec for RV, and 72.4 +/- 12.2 and 116.0 +/- 20.4 msec for LV, respectively. These values were all significantly greater than the means for both N and RVDO groups, except that the mean ICT of LV was insignificantly different between the RVDO and RVSO groups. It was noted that the intervals of LV tended to increase with the increasing intervals of RV, suggesting the changes in LV function secondarily due to RV overloading. It was concluded that the measurement of ICT and IRT of both ventricles is of clinical value for evaluation of overall cardiac function in the patients with RV overloading.
利用双向超声心动图,对14名正常受试者(N)、6例右心室(RV)舒张期负荷过重(DO)患者和5例RV收缩期负荷过重(SO)患者的双侧心室等容收缩时间(ICT)和舒张时间(IRT)进行了测量。RVDO组包括继发孔型房间隔缺损且有大量左向右分流的患者,RVSO组包括各种原因引起的肺动脉高压患者。N组中,RV的平均ICT和IRT分别为28.5±4.8毫秒和43.8±1.7毫秒,左心室(LV)的分别为43.3±5.6毫秒和60.9±9.0毫秒。RVDO组RV的平均ICT和IRT(分别为29.7±4.6毫秒和54.3±11.8毫秒)无显著变化,但LV的ICT和IRT平均值显著更高(分别为58.5±9.5毫秒和83.6±14.1毫秒)。在RVSO组中,RV的平均ICT和IRT分别为51.0±4.1毫秒和86.8±8.2毫秒,LV的分别为72.4±12.2毫秒和116.0±20.4毫秒。这些值均显著高于N组和RVDO组的平均值,不过LV的平均ICT在RVDO组和RVSO组之间差异不显著。值得注意的是,LV的间期倾向于随着RV间期的增加而增加,提示RV负荷过重继发LV功能改变。得出结论,测量双侧心室的ICT和IRT对评估RV负荷过重患者的整体心功能具有临床价值。