[A case report of Hashimoto's disease with anti-thyroxine autoantibody (author's transl)].

In one case of untreated Hashimoto's disease, serum thyroxine (T4) value by radioimmunoassay (RIA) was significantly lower than that by competitive protein binding analysis (CPBA). The discrepancy was found to be due to the presence of antithyroxine autoantibody in the serum. This phenomenon was considered to be of practical importance in interpreting the T4 value by RIA in cases with autoimmune thyroid diseases. The patient was 59-year-old woman with a 30-year history of goiter. A diagnosis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis had been established by open biopsy of the thyroid ten years ago. The patient was judged to be euthyroid on the basis of clinical and laboratory evaluation (mean serum T4 by CPBA (Tetrasorb and Tetratab kit), 5.0 mug/100 ml; serum T3, 165 ng/100 ml; T3 resin uptake, 31.8%; and serum TSH, 2.0 muU/ml). TBG binding capacity was 24 mug/100 ml. Anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (anti-Tg), once positive ten years before, was negative at this time. But the mean T4 in the serum measured by T4 RIA and RIA-Mat T4 kit were 1.7 and 2.9 mug/100 ml, respectively. Recovery of the T4 added to the patient's serum evaluated by RIA-Mat T4 kit, was 71.2%, although the recovery using a control serum was 108%. Binding of 125I-T4 to the serum or fractions of the serum was studied by using polyethylene glycol (PEG) method, column chromatography, and double antibody precipitation. The results were as follows: 1) The binding of 125I-T4 to the patient's serum was detected by using RIA kit system without addition of anti-T4 serum. 2) On Sephadex G-200 chromatography of 125I-T4 incubated with the serum or the rabbit anti-T4 antibody in the presence of ANS, an early radioactive peak was observed by using the patient's serum as in the case of the anti-T4 antibody. When the serum after thermal inactivation of TBG, was incubated with 125I-T4, and was applied to the Sephadex G-200 column, a radioactive peak was observed in the area where 7S fraction was detected by protein peak. 3) The binding of 125I-T4 to the patient's IgG was 9.0% by using double antibody method when the binding to a control IgG was 0.5%. 4) The binding of 125I-T4 to IgG fractions was also proved by PEG method. 5) The binding of 125I-T4 was competitively inhibited by the addition of unlabeled T4. The affinity constant was 1.9 X 10(8) L/mol and its binding capacity was 0.8 mug/100 ml serum. From these data this T4 binding IgG was considered to be anti-T4 autoantibody. The cross reaction with T3 was approximately 8.3%. MIT and DIT did not displace labeled T4 when tested in amounts varying from 0.1 to 100 ng/assay. By using the paper electrophoresis, the binding of 125IT4 to the serum or IgG was not detectable. Therefore this method was considered unsuitable for detecting such anti-T4 antibody. As we couldn't find any significant binding of 125I-T4 to sera in 37 other patients with Hashimoto's disease by using the PEG method, the incidence of this phenomenon was considered to be low...