Stokman C L
Psychiatr Q. 1984 Summer;56(2):138-43. doi: 10.1007/BF01064949.
Clinical judgments of dangerousness depend not only on patient characteristics, but are greatly influenced by the perspective of the rater and the context for which the assessments are made. Similarly, institutional violence is determined not only by patient characteristics, but is also a function of contextual variables such as physical milieu, important clinical events not under the control of the patient, etc. To increase the predictive validity of assessments of dangerousness it is essential to specify the vulnerabilities and strengths of the patient, the current life stressors, and the contextual triggers to which the patient is likely to react violently. The momentary contextual triggers may be useful to predict the type and severity of violence and perhaps the most likely victims as well. Analyses of previous violent incidents may provide markers for contextual triggers, e.g., type of weapon, victim, severity of violence, etc.
对危险性的临床判断不仅取决于患者的特征,还在很大程度上受到评估者的视角以及进行评估的背景的影响。同样,机构内的暴力行为不仅由患者的特征决定,还受诸如物理环境、患者无法控制的重要临床事件等背景变量的影响。为了提高危险性评估的预测效度,明确患者的脆弱性与优势、当前的生活压力源以及患者可能做出暴力反应的背景触发因素至关重要。瞬间的背景触发因素可能有助于预测暴力行为的类型和严重程度,或许还能预测最有可能的受害者。对既往暴力事件的分析可能会提供背景触发因素的标志,例如武器类型、受害者、暴力严重程度等。