Suppr超能文献

肥厚型心肌病诊断病理标准的评估

Evaluation of pathological criteria for diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

作者信息

Rose A G

出版信息

Histopathology. 1984 May;8(3):395-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1984.tb02352.x.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and compare the current pathological criteria for the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM). The following criteria were applied to 39 autopsy patients whose hearts showed myofibre disarray: (i) disarray involving more than 5% of ventricular septal myofibres, (ii) asymmetrical septal hypertrophy (ASH), (iii) mirror-image subaortic plaque, and (iv) a positive histologic HOCM index (HHI). Group 1 (27 patients) with greater than 5% ventricular septal myofibre disarray were diagnosed as HCM, whereas group 2 (12 patients) had less than 5% disarray. The mean disarray value in group 1 was 52% compared to 1.2% in group 2. The two groups showed significant differences regarding ASH and in the amounts of myofibre disarray in the free walls of both ventricles. A new finding was that the histologic HOCM index was significantly higher in patients who died suddenly. The HHI was the commonest positive criterion in group 1, followed by ASH and a mirror-image endocardial plaque. None of the current imperfect pathological criteria for the diagnosis of HCM can be used as the 'gold standard'.

摘要

本研究旨在评估和比较目前肥厚型心肌病(HOCM)诊断的病理标准。以下标准应用于39例心脏显示肌纤维紊乱的尸检患者:(i)紊乱累及超过5%的室间隔肌纤维,(ii)不对称性室间隔肥厚(ASH),(iii)镜像性主动脉瓣下斑块,以及(iv)组织学肥厚型心肌病指数(HHI)阳性。第1组(27例患者)室间隔肌纤维紊乱超过5%被诊断为HCM,而第2组(12例患者)紊乱少于5%。第1组的平均紊乱值为52%,而第2组为1.2%。两组在ASH以及两个心室游离壁的肌纤维紊乱程度方面存在显著差异。一个新发现是,猝死患者的组织学肥厚型心肌病指数显著更高。HHI是第1组最常见的阳性标准,其次是ASH和镜像性心内膜斑块。目前用于诊断HCM的任何不完善的病理标准都不能用作“金标准”。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验