Jungi T W, Imbach P, Barandun S
Blut. 1984 Jun;48(6):345-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00319961.
The efficacy of IgG infusion therapy in ITP is now established even in cases resistant to other forms of therapy. However, the mechanism of action is still speculative. We assume that a correction of the elevated thrombocyte clearance is brought about at several levels. First, antibodies specific for an inciting antigen (and for which the patient is deficient) may remove free antigen and/or immune complexes which adhere to platelet surfaces, thereby rendering platelets less susceptible to clearance. Second, IgG may act nonspecifically by protecting the platelet surface from becoming covered with immune complexes. Third, monomeric IgG may display a nonspecific inhibitory effect at the level of the interaction of immunologically altered platelets with Fc receptors of mononuclear phagocytes. For the latter effect, good in vivo evidence exists. However, it must be born in mind that interaction of antibodies with Fc receptors is but one mechanisms for triggering adherence and endocytosis. A variety of other receptors and binding sites exists which may interact with immunologically altered thrombocytes. These may either trigger phagocytes on their own or facilitate the interaction of antibodies and Fc receptors. How IgG infusion influences such interactions remains to be determined.
现在已经证实,免疫球蛋白G输注疗法对免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)有效,即使是对其他治疗形式耐药的病例。然而,其作用机制仍属推测。我们认为,血小板清除率升高的纠正可在多个层面实现。首先,针对激发抗原(且患者缺乏该抗原特异性抗体)的抗体可清除游离抗原和/或附着于血小板表面的免疫复合物,从而使血小板较不易被清除。其次,免疫球蛋白G可通过保护血小板表面不被免疫复合物覆盖而发挥非特异性作用。第三,单体免疫球蛋白G可能在免疫改变的血小板与单核吞噬细胞Fc受体相互作用层面发挥非特异性抑制作用。对于后一种作用,存在充分的体内证据。然而,必须牢记,抗体与Fc受体的相互作用只是触发黏附和内吞作用的一种机制。还存在多种其他受体和结合位点,它们可能与免疫改变的血小板相互作用。这些受体和结合位点可能自身触发吞噬细胞,或促进抗体与Fc受体的相互作用。免疫球蛋白G输注如何影响此类相互作用仍有待确定。