• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射地西泮镇静后的失忆、疼痛体验及患者满意度

Amnesia, pain experience, and patient satisfaction after sedation with intravenous diazepam.

作者信息

Lundgren S, Rosenquist J B

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Feb;41(2):99-102. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90215-x.

DOI:10.1016/0278-2391(83)90215-x
PMID:6571888
Abstract

Recovery time, the effect of sedation or amnesia on postoperative pain, and patients' opinions of the sedation were studied. Forty operations were performed on 20 patients. Each patient had four impacted third molars removed in two sessions, one in which a new emulsion form of diazepam (Diazemuls) was used, and one in which no sedation was used. The recovery from sedation was found to be very individual and not related to the dose administered, as assessed by a simple, easy-to-use method. There was no difference in postoperative pain between the sedated and unsedated groups, and we found no correlation between postoperative pain and amnesia. Eighty-five per cent of the patients preferred sedation during surgery, even though none of them had a preoperative indication for sedation.

摘要

研究了恢复时间、镇静或遗忘对术后疼痛的影响以及患者对镇静的看法。对20名患者进行了40次手术。每位患者分两次拔除4颗阻生第三磨牙,一次使用新的地西泮乳剂(安定乳剂),另一次不使用镇静剂。通过一种简单易用的方法评估发现,镇静恢复情况因人而异,与给药剂量无关。镇静组和非镇静组术后疼痛无差异,且术后疼痛与遗忘之间无相关性。85%的患者更喜欢在手术期间接受镇静,尽管他们术前均无镇静指征。

相似文献

1
Amnesia, pain experience, and patient satisfaction after sedation with intravenous diazepam.静脉注射地西泮镇静后的失忆、疼痛体验及患者满意度
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Feb;41(2):99-102. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90215-x.
2
Comparison of sedation, amnesia, and patient comfort produced by intravenous and rectal diazepam.静脉注射和直肠给予地西泮所产生的镇静、失忆及患者舒适度的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Oct;42(10):646-50. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(84)90206-4.
3
A study of intravenous sedation with diazepam and midazolam for dentistry in Hong Kong Chinese.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986 Nov;14(4):404-11. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8601400413.
4
Intravenous or rectal diazepam for outpatient sedation in minor oral surgery.静脉注射或直肠给药地西泮用于口腔小手术的门诊镇静。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Oct;15(5):541-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80056-4.
5
Conscious sedation with intravenous drugs: a study of amnesia.
J Oral Surg. 1978 Mar;36(3):191-7.
6
An evaluation of the amnesic effects of diazepam sedation.地西泮镇静失忆作用的评估。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Nov;42(11):712-6. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(84)90418-x.
7
A comparative study of intravenous diazepam and midazolam for oral surgery.静脉注射地西泮和咪达唑仑用于口腔手术的对比研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Nov;44(11):860-3. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90222-3.
8
Comparison of rectal diazepam and subcutaneous morphine-scopolamine administration for outpatient sedation in minor oral surgery.直肠给予地西泮与皮下注射吗啡-东莨菪碱用于小型口腔外科门诊镇静的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Oct;29(7):674-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02279.x.
9
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery.门诊第三磨牙手术中右美托咪定与咪达唑仑的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;64(9):1353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.020.
10
A comparison of amnesia in outpatients sedated with midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl during oral surgery.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Dec;113(6):894-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0302.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of moderate sedation for radiologic non-vascular intervention.放射学非血管介入中度镇静的安全性与有效性
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Apr-Jun;7(2):125-30. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.2.125.
2
A comparison of transcutaneous PO2 in patients sedated with diazepam-fentanyl or midazolam-fentanyl.使用地西泮-芬太尼或咪达唑仑-芬太尼镇静的患者经皮氧分压的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1989 May-Jun;36(3):93-7.