Suppr超能文献

直肠给予地西泮与皮下注射吗啡-东莨菪碱用于小型口腔外科门诊镇静的比较。

Comparison of rectal diazepam and subcutaneous morphine-scopolamine administration for outpatient sedation in minor oral surgery.

作者信息

Lundgren S

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Oct;29(7):674-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02279.x.

Abstract

In a randomized cross-over study on sedation in outpatient oral surgery, subcutaneous administration of morphine-scopolamine was compared with rectal administration of diazepam. The mean dose of morphine was 0.13 mg kg-1 (range 0.13-0.24) and of diazepam 0.57 mg kg-1 (range 0.50-0.71). Apprehension, the determining factor for patients' preference for sedation method, the recovery from sedation and the postoperative course were studied. Both methods produced the desired effects. For diazepam, the effect was scored higher by the patient than the nurse observer and for morphine-scopolamine the opposite was found. Postoperative pain and patients' preference for sedation did not differ between the methods and the determining factor for the patients' preference for sedation method was the experience of stronger tranquilization. Side-effects such as prolonged recovery, nausea, dizziness, and dysphoria were frequent during the postoperative course after the morphine-scopolamine sedation but were not seen during diazepam sedation. Thus, rectal administration of diazepam should be preferred to morphine and scopolamine for sedation in minor oral surgery performed under local anesthesia.

摘要

在一项关于门诊口腔手术镇静的随机交叉研究中,比较了皮下注射吗啡 - 东莨菪碱与直肠给予地西泮的效果。吗啡的平均剂量为0.13 mg kg-1(范围0.13 - 0.24),地西泮的平均剂量为0.57 mg kg-1(范围0.50 - 0.71)。研究了焦虑(患者对镇静方法偏好的决定因素)、镇静恢复情况及术后过程。两种方法均产生了预期效果。对于地西泮,患者给出的效果评分高于护士观察者;而对于吗啡 - 东莨菪碱,情况则相反。术后疼痛及患者对镇静的偏好,在两种方法之间并无差异,患者对镇静方法偏好的决定因素是更强镇静的体验。在吗啡 - 东莨菪碱镇静后的术后过程中,诸如恢复时间延长、恶心、头晕及烦躁不安等副作用较为常见,但在地西泮镇静期间未出现。因此,在局部麻醉下进行的小型口腔手术中,直肠给予地西泮应比吗啡和东莨菪碱更适合用于镇静。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验