Tomasz M, Barton J K, Magliozzo C C, Tucker D, Lafer E M, Stollar B D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(10):2874-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.10.2874.
Poly(dG-dC) . poly(dG-dC) and Micrococcus lysodeikticus DNA were modified by exposure to reductively activated mitomycin C, an antitumor antibiotic. The resulting covalent drug-polynucleotide complexes displayed varying degrees of CD inversions, which are strikingly similar to the inverted spectrum observed with Z-DNA. The following criteria have been used to establish, however, that the inverted CD pattern seen in mitomycin C-polynucleotide complexes does not reflect a Z-DNA conformation. (i) The ethanol-induced transition of poly(dG-dC) . poly(dG-dC) from B to Z conformation is not facilitated but rather is inhibited by mitomycin C modification. This may be due to the presence of crosslinks, (ii) Radioimmunoassay indicated no competition for Z-DNA-specific antibody by any of the mitomycin C-modified polynucleotides, (iii) 31P NMR of the complexes yielded a single relatively narrow resonance, which is inconsistent with the dinucleotide repeat characteristic of Z-DNA. Alternative explanations for the inverted CD pattern include a drug-induced left-handed but non-Z conformational change or the superposition of an induced CD onto the CD of B-DNA due to drug-base electronic interactions. These results illustrate the need for caution in interpreting CD changes alone as an indication of Z-DNA conformation.
聚(dG-dC)·聚(dG-dC)和溶壁微球菌DNA通过暴露于还原活化的丝裂霉素C(一种抗肿瘤抗生素)进行修饰。所得的共价药物-多核苷酸复合物呈现出不同程度的圆二色性(CD)反转,这与Z-DNA观察到的反转光谱惊人地相似。然而,已使用以下标准来确定丝裂霉素C-多核苷酸复合物中看到的反转CD模式并不反映Z-DNA构象。(i)乙醇诱导的聚(dG-dC)·聚(dG-dC)从B构象到Z构象的转变并未得到促进,反而受到丝裂霉素C修饰的抑制。这可能是由于交联的存在,(ii)放射免疫测定表明任何丝裂霉素C修饰的多核苷酸都不会与Z-DNA特异性抗体竞争,(iii)复合物的31P核磁共振产生单个相对较窄的共振,这与Z-DNA的二核苷酸重复特征不一致。对反转CD模式的其他解释包括药物诱导的左手但非Z构象变化,或由于药物-碱基电子相互作用,诱导的CD叠加在B-DNA的CD上。这些结果表明,仅将CD变化解释为Z-DNA构象的指示时需要谨慎。