Suppr超能文献

EA 玫瑰花结试验在宫颈癌早期检测中的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.

作者信息

Wagner D, Noltenius H W

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1983 Jul-Aug;27(4):403-7.

PMID:6576540
Abstract

It was previously found that a negative EA-rosette test, showing EA-rosette-forming cells in a cervical cell suspension, excluded the presence of cells of invasive carcinoma (predictive value of 99.9%). This study on 2,462 patients confirmed the applicability of the EA-rosette test in screening for precancerous as well as cancerous lesions. In 98.6% of the cases of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma, the cervical cell suspensions contained EA-rosette forming cells (the rosette test was positive). With a negative EA-rosette test, the probability of missing a specimen with class III cytology (mild/moderate dysplasia) was 1.4%, of missing one with class IV cytology (severe dysplasia/carcinoma in situ) was 0.8% and of missing one with class V cytology (invasive carcinoma) was 0.25%. The predictive value of a negative EA-rosette test was 98.6%. The false-negative rate for negative EA-rosette tests was 3.7% for invasive carcinoma, 17.5% for carcinoma in situ and severe dysplasia and 41.4% for mild to moderate dysplasia.

摘要

先前发现,宫颈细胞悬液中出现EA玫瑰花结形成细胞的EA玫瑰花结试验阴性可排除浸润癌细胞的存在(预测值为99.9%)。这项对2462例患者的研究证实了EA玫瑰花结试验在筛查癌前病变和癌性病变中的适用性。在98.6%的发育异常、原位癌和浸润癌病例中,宫颈细胞悬液含有EA玫瑰花结形成细胞(玫瑰花结试验呈阳性)。EA玫瑰花结试验阴性时,漏检III级细胞学(轻度/中度发育异常)标本的概率为1.4%,漏检IV级细胞学(重度发育异常/原位癌)标本的概率为0.8%,漏检V级细胞学(浸润癌)标本的概率为0.25%。EA玫瑰花结试验阴性的预测值为98.6%。EA玫瑰花结试验阴性的假阴性率在浸润癌中为3.7%,在原位癌和重度发育异常中为17.5%,在轻度至中度发育异常中为41.4%。

相似文献

5
The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
Acta Cytol. 1981 May-Jun;25(3):237-44.
9
[The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author's transl)].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1979 Sep 21;104(38):1331-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1129093.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验