Swartz M L, Phillips R W, Clark H E
J Dent Res. 1984 Feb;63(2):158-60. doi: 10.1177/00220345840630021301.
Fluoride release from three commercial glass ionomer filling cements and three glass ionomer luting cements was measured in the laboratory over a 12-month period. Fluoride release from these glass ionomer cements was compared with that released from a silicate, silicophosphate, and a fluoride-containing polycarboxylate cement. The fluoride released from the glass ionomer cements throughout the one-year period was similar, both in quantity and pattern, to that released by the silicate cement. The silicophosphate cement tended to release fluoride in somewhat lesser amounts, while the amount of fluoride released by the polycarboxylate was negligible after the first few days. Analysis of these data indicates that these glass ionomer cements probably possess anticariogenic properties similar to those of silicate cement.
在实验室中，对三种市售玻璃离子充填水门汀和三种玻璃离子粘结水门汀在12个月期间的氟释放情况进行了测定。将这些玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放情况与一种硅酸盐、一种硅磷酸盐和一种含氟聚羧酸锌水门汀的氟释放情况进行了比较。在整个一年期间，玻璃离子水门汀释放的氟在数量和模式上与硅酸盐水泥释放的氟相似。硅磷酸盐水泥释放的氟量往往略少，而聚羧酸锌水门汀在开始几天之后释放的氟量可忽略不计。对这些数据的分析表明，这些玻璃离子水门汀可能具有与硅酸盐水泥相似的防龋性能。
