Tveit A B, Gjerdet N R
J Oral Rehabil. 1981 May;8(3):237-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00498.x.
This study aimed to compare the fluoride release from a fluoride-containing amalgam, a silicate cement and a glass ionomer cement in artificial saliva. After storing specimens in an artificial saliva for 7 weeks, the fluoride content in the solvent was measured by a spectrophotometric method. The fluoride release from silicate cement was about 5 times greater than from glass ionomer cement, which again showed a release 4 times greater than the fluoride-containing amalgam. The fluoride release relative to fluoride content in test specimens was greater from fluoride-containing amalgam and silicate cement than from glass ionomer cement.
本研究旨在比较含氟汞合金、硅酸盐水泥和玻璃离子水门汀在人工唾液中的氟释放情况。将标本在人工唾液中储存7周后，采用分光光度法测量溶剂中的氟含量。硅酸盐水泥的氟释放量约为玻璃离子水门汀的5倍，而玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放量又比含氟汞合金高4倍。相对于测试标本中的氟含量，含氟汞合金和硅酸盐水泥的氟释放量比玻璃离子水门汀更大。
