• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型碱式铝硅酸盐材料与传统修复材料、大块充填复合树脂及玻璃离子水门汀的断裂强度和氟释放性能的评估与比较:一项研究

Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An Study.

作者信息

Kashiyani Savan K, Khanna Shreya A, Jobanputra Leena, Patel Niharika, Patel Hirenkumar P, Patel Apoorva D

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Jamanagar, Gujarat, India.

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2291-S2293. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24
PMID:39346138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426562/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate and compare fluoride ion release by Cention-N (self-cure and light-cure) and conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) at different pH levels and time intervals.

METHODOLOGY

For fluoride release assessment, 240 samples (10 mm diameter, 2 mm height) of Cention-N and conventional glass-ionomer cement were created using rubber rings. Samples were stored in deionized water, and the cumulative fluoride ion release and change in pH were assessed using a spectrophotometer and pH meter, respectively, at the end of 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

All three samples exhibited very high fluoride release in an acidic medium compared to the neutral medium. Although GIC demonstrated superior fluoride release, Cention-N displayed adequate fluoride release over a longer duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both Glass ionomer cement and Cention-N showed an initial fluoride burst.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较Cention-N(自固化和光固化)与传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)在不同pH水平和时间间隔下的氟离子释放情况。

方法

为评估氟释放情况,使用橡胶圈制作了240个Cention-N和传统玻璃离子水门汀的样本(直径10毫米,高2毫米)。样本储存在去离子水中,分别在7天、14天和21天结束时使用分光光度计和pH计评估累积氟离子释放量和pH值变化。对获得的数据进行统计分析。

结果

与中性介质相比,所有三个样本在酸性介质中均表现出非常高的氟释放。尽管GIC显示出更好的氟释放,但Cention-N在更长时间内显示出足够的氟释放。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,玻璃离子水门汀和Cention-N均表现出初始氟离子突释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d7e/11426562/9ed5afae6525/JPBS-16-2291-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d7e/11426562/9e4b5c4b3913/JPBS-16-2291-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d7e/11426562/9ed5afae6525/JPBS-16-2291-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d7e/11426562/9e4b5c4b3913/JPBS-16-2291-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d7e/11426562/9ed5afae6525/JPBS-16-2291-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An Study.新型碱式铝硅酸盐材料与传统修复材料、大块充填复合树脂及玻璃离子水门汀的断裂强度和氟释放性能的评估与比较:一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2291-S2293. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite.新型大块充填碱式玻璃离子体的氟离子释放及碱化潜力比较
J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):296-299. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_74_19.
3
Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of conventional glass-ionomer cement and bulk-fill alkasite material when combined with doxycycline and double antibiotic paste containing ciprofloxacin and metronidazole against and spp.: An study.常规玻璃离子水门汀与块状银硅材料联合应用多西环素和含环丙沙星及甲硝唑的双抗生素糊剂对抗 和 种的抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Oct-Dec;38(4):361-366. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_143_20.
4
An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.一种新型自固化填充材料机械性能和释氟能力的体外评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):134-139.
5
An Study to Compare the Release of Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) and Zirconomer.一项比较玻璃离子水门汀(富士IX)和锆基水门汀氟释放情况的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2141.
6
Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material - An study.碱土硅酸盐、纳米离子体和玻璃离子修复材料长期氟释放及抗菌活性的比较评价——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):485-490. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_336_21. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
7
A comparative evaluation of fracture toughness, flexural strength, and acid buffer capability of a bulk-fill alkasite with high-strength glass-ionomer cement: An study.高强度玻璃离子水门汀与大块充填碱式玻璃离子水门汀的断裂韧性、抗弯强度和酸缓冲能力的比较评价:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Oct 20;19:90. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from hydroxyapatite incorporated and conventional glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.含羟基磷灰石的传统玻璃离子水门汀氟释放的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Oct-Dec;30(4):284-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.108921.
9
An Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study.后牙高强度玻璃离子水门汀与玻璃混合大体积充填碱式硅铝酸盐修复材料作为混合牙列期儿童保守性粘结修复体的固位及抗菌效果评估:一项对比研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):529-534. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435.
10
A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.常规玻璃离子水门汀(Ⅱ型)、儿童玻璃离子水门汀(Ⅸ型)和 Cention-N 的氟释放和再矿化能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;25(2):161-168. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials.新型大块充填碱硅玻璃陶瓷与传统修复材料的力学和物理性能比较评估
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Nov;33(7):666-673. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification.市售含氟修复材料:综述与分类建议
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 18;13(10):2313. doi: 10.3390/ma13102313.
3
Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite.
新型大块充填碱式玻璃离子体的氟离子释放及碱化潜力比较
J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):296-299. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_74_19.
4
Quantitative assessment of fluoride release and recharge ability of different restorative materials in different media: an in vitro study.不同介质中不同修复材料氟释放及再充注能力的定量评估:一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC31-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9985.5275. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
5
Long-term F release from glass ionomer cements.玻璃离子水门汀的长期氟释放
J Dent Res. 1984 Feb;63(2):158-60. doi: 10.1177/00220345840630021301.