Suppr超能文献

布洛芬-可待因组合的镇痛效果

Analgesic efficacy of an ibuprofen-codeine combination.

作者信息

Cooper S A, Engel J, Ladov M, Precheur H, Rosenheck A, Rauch D

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 1982 May-Jun;2(3):162-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1982.tb04528.x.

Abstract

Subjects who had undergone dental impaction surgery and who had moderate to severe postoperative pain were given, under double-blind, randomized conditions, a single dose of either codeine 60 mg, aspirin 650 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, aspirin 650 mg + codeine 60 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg + codeine 60 mg, or placebo. A total of 249 subjects were included in the statistical analysis. On a report form, subjects recorded pain intensity, pain relief, and side effects hourly for four hours. They also gave an overall impression at the end of the observation period. Analysis of variance and pairwise contrasts were used to analyze the data. For the sum of pain intensity differences, the total of the hourly pain relief scores, and overall impression, there was a significant analgesic effect for codeine, aspirin, and ibuprofen and no significant interaction when they were used in combination. Ibuprofen alone was statistically superior to aspirin and also achieved higher mean scores than the aspirin-codeine combination. The ibuprofen-codeine combination was the most effective treatment for every analgesic parameter, but it was not statistically superior to ibuprofen alone. The possibility exists that the ibuprofen-codeine combination peaked out the sensitivity of the model. There was no notable difference in the frequency or intensity of side effects among the treatment groups, and no subject had to withdraw due to an adverse effect. This study again confirms the superiority of ibuprofen to aspirin and suggests that ibuprofen is at least as effective as an aspirin-codeine combination. Codeine added a small amount of additional analgesia when used in combination with ibuprofen.

摘要

接受过阻生牙拔除手术且术后有中度至重度疼痛的受试者,在双盲、随机条件下,单次给予60毫克可待因、650毫克阿司匹林、400毫克布洛芬、650毫克阿司匹林 + 60毫克可待因、400毫克布洛芬 + 60毫克可待因或安慰剂。共有249名受试者纳入统计分析。受试者在报告表上每小时记录一次疼痛强度、疼痛缓解情况和副作用,持续四小时。他们还在观察期结束时给出总体印象。采用方差分析和两两对比分析数据。对于疼痛强度差异总和、每小时疼痛缓解评分总和以及总体印象,可待因、阿司匹林和布洛芬有显著镇痛效果,联合使用时无显著相互作用。单独使用布洛芬在统计学上优于阿司匹林,且平均得分也高于阿司匹林 - 可待因组合。布洛芬 - 可待因组合对每个镇痛参数都是最有效的治疗方法,但在统计学上并不优于单独使用布洛芬。存在布洛芬 - 可待因组合使模型敏感性达到峰值的可能性。各治疗组副作用的频率或强度无显著差异,且没有受试者因不良反应而退出。本研究再次证实布洛芬优于阿司匹林,并表明布洛芬至少与阿司匹林 - 可待因组合一样有效。可待因与布洛芬联合使用时可增加少量额外镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验