Mbuyi-Muamba J M, Dequeker J
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(9):612-7. doi: 10.1185/03007998309109806.
Forty-five patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis were randomly allocated into two groups and treated with piroxicam 20 mg once daily or naproxen 250 mg twice daily in a 3-month, double-blind study. The results were available in 38 patients (21 in the piroxicam group and 17 in the naproxen group). Both drugs showed significant effects on the majority of clinical parameters compared to baseline. However, piroxicam was significantly superior to naproxen in reducing the grade of swollen joints. Moreover, piroxicam had better efficacy as shown by the number of patients who preferred it to previous therapy; 13 (62% of the patients entered) compared to 8 patients (47%) who preferred naproxen. Tolerance of the two drugs was similar. Two patients in each group dropped out due to side-effects.
在一项为期3个月的双盲研究中,45例确诊或典型类风湿性关节炎患者被随机分为两组,分别接受每日一次20毫克吡罗昔康或每日两次250毫克萘普生治疗。38例患者(吡罗昔康组21例,萘普生组17例)有研究结果。与基线相比,两种药物对大多数临床参数均显示出显著效果。然而,在减轻关节肿胀程度方面,吡罗昔康明显优于萘普生。此外,从更倾向于选择吡罗昔康而非先前治疗的患者数量来看,吡罗昔康疗效更佳;有13例(占入组患者的62%),而倾向于萘普生的患者有8例(占47%)。两种药物的耐受性相似。每组各有两名患者因副作用退出研究。