Suppr超能文献

使用压电探测器监测麻醉蒸汽浓度:恩斯特龙EMMA的评估

Monitoring anesthetic vapor concentrations using a piezoelectric detector: evaluation of the Engstrom EMMA.

作者信息

Hayes J K, Westenskow D R, Jordan W S

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1983 Nov;59(5):435-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198311000-00013.

Abstract

The Engstrom anesthetic gas analyzer (EMMA) was evaluated to determine the reproducibility, response time, gas interference, water vapor dependence, and sensitivity. The analyzer also was evaluated clinically in 20 children undergoing orthopedic surgery. Difference between the analyzer output and anesthetic gas standard (reproducibility) ranged from 0.013 +/- 0.008 vol % to 0.018 +/- 0.018 vol %. Response times decreased from 710 ms at 5 l X min-1 to 149 ms at 30 l X min-1. Nitrous oxide caused an offset of +0.11 +/- 0.007 vol %. Water vapor caused positive offsets of 0.25 +/- 0.044 vol %, 0.51 +/- 0.027 vol %, and 0.80 +/- 0.037 vol % at 25 degrees C, 30 degrees C, and 34 degrees C, respectively. The analyzer reproducibly measured dry gas concentrations, but compensation had to be made for water vapor when measuring wet gases. The analyzer's usefulness for end-tidal monitoring was questioned because of its slow response time and its sensitivity to water vapor.

摘要

对恩斯特龙麻醉气体分析仪(EMMA)进行了评估,以确定其重现性、响应时间、气体干扰、对水蒸气的依赖性和灵敏度。还对20名接受骨科手术的儿童进行了该分析仪的临床评估。分析仪输出与麻醉气体标准之间的差异(重现性)范围为0.013±0.008体积%至0.018±0.018体积%。响应时间从5升/分钟时的710毫秒降至30升/分钟时的149毫秒。氧化亚氮导致偏移量为+0.11±0.007体积%。在25℃、30℃和34℃时,水蒸气分别导致正偏移量为0.25±0.044体积%、0.51±0.027体积%和0.80±0.037体积%。该分析仪可重现地测量干气浓度,但在测量湿气时必须对水蒸气进行补偿。由于其响应时间较慢且对水蒸气敏感,该分析仪用于呼气末监测的实用性受到质疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验