Remington B, Clarke S
J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Fall;16(3):315-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-315.
Two methods of training autistic children to use manual signs were compared. Two children, one mute and one capable of some verbal imitation, were taught to use signs as expressive labels for pictures of objects. Using an alternating treatments design, speed of sign acquisition was compared across two training conditions in which signs were presented either accompanied by, or without, the corresponding verbal label. In both conditions, the training procedure incorporated reinforcement, modeling, prompting, fading, and stimulus rotation. The efficacy of training in both treatment conditions was demonstrated by the use of a multiple baseline control across signs, but no clear differences in acquisition speed across conditions were apparent. Posttests conducted to assess stimulus control of signing, and learning of verbal labels when these were present in training, showed that the behavior of the imitative, but not the mute, child was controlled by the verbal stimuli. The implications of the results both for understanding deficits characteristic of autistic children and for developing appropriate language training procedures are discussed.
比较了两种训练自闭症儿童使用手势的方法。两名儿童,一名是哑巴,另一名能够进行一些言语模仿,他们被教导使用手势作为物体图片的表达性标签。采用交替治疗设计,比较了在两种训练条件下手势习得的速度,在这两种条件下,呈现手势时要么伴有相应的言语标签,要么没有。在两种条件下,训练程序都包括强化、示范、提示、消退和刺激轮换。通过对不同手势使用多重基线控制,证明了两种治疗条件下训练的有效性,但不同条件下习得速度没有明显差异。为评估手势的刺激控制以及在训练中出现言语标签时对言语标签的学习而进行的后测表明,模仿儿童而非哑巴儿童的行为受言语刺激控制。讨论了这些结果对于理解自闭症儿童的特征缺陷以及制定适当语言训练程序的意义。