Stromer R, Mackay H A, Remington B
Behavioral Sciences Division, Eunjce Kennedy Shriver Center, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):409-31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-409.
The methods used in Sidman's original studies on equivalence classes provide a framework for analyzing functional verbal behavior. Sidman and others have shown how teaching receptive, name-referent matching may produce rudimentary oral reading and word comprehension skills. Eikeseth and Smith (1992) have extended these findings by showing that children with autism may acquire equivalence classes after learning to supply a common oral name to each stimulus in a potential class. A stimulus class analysis suggests ways to examine (a) the problem of programming generalization from teaching situations to other environments, (b) the expansion of the repertoires that occur in those settings, and (c) the use of naming to facilitate these forms of generalization. Such research will help to clarify and extend Horne and Lowe's recent (1996) account of the role of verbal behavior in the formation of stimulus classes.
西德曼关于等价类的原始研究中所使用的方法为分析功能性言语行为提供了一个框架。西德曼等人已经表明,教授接受性的名称-指称匹配如何能够产生基本的口头阅读和单词理解技能。艾克塞斯和史密斯(1992)通过表明自闭症儿童在学会为潜在类别的每个刺激提供一个共同的口头名称后可能获得等价类,扩展了这些发现。刺激类分析提出了一些方法来检验:(a)从教学情境向其他环境进行泛化编程的问题;(b)在那些情境中出现的技能库扩展;以及(c)使用命名来促进这些泛化形式。这样的研究将有助于澄清和扩展霍恩和洛(1996)最近关于言语行为在刺激类形成中的作用的阐述。