Sheehan J G, Tanaka J S
J Pers Assess. 1983 Oct;47(5):462-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4705_2.
Fifty adult stutterers entering therapy at the UCLA Psychology Clinic were administered the Rorschach, with a Klopfer method inquiry, scoring, form level rating, and calculation of scores on the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale (RPRS). On the basis of independent clinician ratings of attitudinal or psychotherapeutic improvement, subjects were divided into groups of Improved Most (n = 21) and Improved Least (n = 29). Subjects were also divided into Continued (n = 43) and Dropped (n = 7). Logistic regression was employed to compare groups on the following Rorschach dimensions: Prognostic Score (RPRS); Human Movement; Animal Movement; Inanimate Movement; Shading; Color; Form Level. The Improved Most group was significantly higher in M, FM, Shading, and Productivity. The finding that M and FM discriminates between improvement groups corroborates results obtained in a previous study (Sheehan et al., 1954). The Rorschach movement variables, particularly M and FM, seem to be stable indicators of capacity for improvement in psychotherapy.
五十名在加州大学洛杉矶分校心理学诊所开始治疗的成年口吃者接受了罗夏墨迹测验，采用克洛普弗方法进行询问、计分、形式水平评级，并计算罗夏预后评定量表（RPRS）的得分。根据临床医生对态度或心理治疗改善情况的独立评级，将受试者分为改善最大组（n = 21）和改善最小组（n = 29）。受试者还被分为持续治疗组（n = 43）和退出治疗组（n = 7）。采用逻辑回归分析，比较两组在以下罗夏墨迹测验维度上的差异：预后得分（RPRS）；人物动作；动物动作；无生命物体动作；阴影；颜色；形式水平。改善最大组在M、FM、阴影和生产力方面显著更高。M和FM能够区分改善组这一发现证实了先前一项研究（希恩等人，1954年）的结果。罗夏墨迹测验的动作变量，尤其是M和FM，似乎是心理治疗中改善能力的稳定指标。
