Howe H L, Hoff M B
Cancer Detect Prev. 1983;6(4-5):473-83.
Recall bias in retrospective studies among cases reporting events which occur prior to diagnosis is difficult to measure. In this paper breast self-examination (BSE) practice as reported in a general population survey of 395 women is compared to data on BSE practice from six recent retrospective case-control studies of breast cancer. The focus is on the change in reported level of BSE practice which is associated with a change in the level of related study variables. The patterns of these differences in reported BSE practice are compared for the available categories of age, education, marital status, and menopausal status in each retrospective study to the corresponding pattern in the survey data. The patterns are similar except for the comparison by education. The other variables give no evidence of postdisease reporting bias. Factors other than postdisease reporting bias which might account for the education difference are discussed. Further development of a model for the impact of education on reporting bias is needed.
在回顾性研究中,对于报告诊断前发生事件的病例,回忆偏倚难以衡量。在本文中,将395名女性的一般人群调查中报告的乳房自我检查(BSE)做法与最近六项乳腺癌回顾性病例对照研究中的BSE做法数据进行了比较。重点是报告的BSE做法水平的变化,这与相关研究变量水平的变化相关。将每项回顾性研究中按年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况和绝经状态划分的可用类别中报告的BSE做法差异模式与调查数据中的相应模式进行比较。除了按教育程度进行的比较外,这些模式相似。其他变量没有显示出病后报告偏倚的证据。讨论了除病后报告偏倚之外可能导致教育差异的因素。需要进一步开发一个教育对报告偏倚影响的模型。