Suppr超能文献

空气污染物暴露的对照临床研究:评估与空气质量标准相关的科学信息。

Controlled clinical studies of air pollutant exposure: evaluating scientific information in relation to air quality standards.

作者信息

Hackney J D, Linn W S

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Oct;52:187-91. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8352187.

Abstract

In controlled clinical studies, volunteers are deliberately exposed to specific air pollutants under conditions simulating ambient exposures, and health-related responses are documented. Studies of the health risks of air pollution need to be scientifically rigorous and clearly relevant to "real-world" pollution exposures. Their results should be confirmed by independent replication if they are to be used as a basis for air quality regulations. Well-designed controlled clinical studies readily meet these criteria, and complement the other methods of scientific risk assessment--animal toxicology and epidemiology. Clinical studies, toxicology, and epidemiology all have provided important information about air pollution health effects. A better understanding of the interrelationships of findings from these different fields is needed.

摘要

在对照临床研究中,志愿者在模拟环境暴露的条件下被有意暴露于特定空气污染物中,并记录与健康相关的反应。空气污染健康风险研究需要科学严谨,且与“现实世界”的污染暴露明显相关。如果要将其结果用作空气质量法规的依据,就应该通过独立重复研究加以证实。精心设计的对照临床研究很容易满足这些标准,并补充科学风险评估的其他方法——动物毒理学和流行病学。临床研究、毒理学和流行病学都提供了有关空气污染对健康影响的重要信息。需要更好地理解这些不同领域研究结果之间的相互关系。

相似文献

8
Do group responses mask the effects of air pollutants on potentially sensitive individuals in controlled human exposure studies?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;71(3):552-64. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验