• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订版生活目的量表:一项跨国效度研究。

The Modified Purpose in Life Scale: a Cross-National Validity Study.

作者信息

Chang R H, Dodder R A

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1983;18(3):207-17. doi: 10.2190/qkgn-e1hw-ca88-x6k3.

DOI:10.2190/qkgn-e1hw-ca88-x6k3
PMID:6671837
Abstract

Although the original 20-item Purpose in Life Test (PIL) has been subjected to various reliability and validity tests, its use has been limited largely to American culture. In this paper ten items were selected from the original scale, and both directionality and response categories were modified. This Ten-Item Modified Purpose in Life Test was then validated through item analysis by using two cross-national samples of elderly people. One sample consisted of 177 retirees from the school system in Payne County, Oklahoma, and the other consisted of 202 retired teachers in Taipei, Taiwan. It was concluded from this study that the Ten-Item Modified Purpose in Life Scale can be reduced to the Seven-Item Modified Purpose in Life Scale as an alternative measure for comparing the psychological well-being of the elderly cross-nationally.

摘要

尽管最初的20项生活目的测试(PIL)已经经过了各种信效度测试,但其应用在很大程度上局限于美国文化。在本文中,从原始量表中选取了10个项目,并对其方向性和反应类别进行了修改。然后,通过对两个跨国老年人样本进行项目分析,对这个十项修订版生活目的测试进行了验证。一个样本由俄克拉荷马州佩恩县学校系统的177名退休人员组成,另一个样本由台湾台北的202名退休教师组成。这项研究得出的结论是,十项修订版生活目的量表可以简化为七项修订版生活目的量表,作为跨国比较老年人心理健康状况的替代测量方法。

相似文献

1
The Modified Purpose in Life Scale: a Cross-National Validity Study.修订版生活目的量表:一项跨国效度研究。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1983;18(3):207-17. doi: 10.2190/qkgn-e1hw-ca88-x6k3.
2
CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF A MEANING IN LIFE SCALE IN THE TAIWANESE CULTURAL CONTEXT.台湾文化背景下生命意义量表的构建与验证
Psychol Rep. 2015 Oct;117(2):437-51. doi: 10.2466/08.07.PR0.117c19z4. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
3
Psychometric integrity of the Chinese Happiness Inventory among retired older people in Taiwan.台湾退休老年人中《中文幸福量表》的心理测量学信效度
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Jul;16(7):865-72. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12568. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
4
Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the Purpose in Life Questionnaire.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):384-92. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<384::aid-jclp2270440312>3.0.co;2-1.
5
Cross-national health comparisons using the Rasch model: findings from the 2012 US Health and Retirement Study and the 2012 Mexican Health and Aging Study.跨国健康比较的 Rasch 模型应用:来自 2012 年美国健康与退休研究和 2012 年墨西哥健康与老龄化研究的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2431-2441. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1878-4. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
7
Modeling psychological well-being and family relationships among retired older people in Taiwan.台湾地区退休老年人的心理健康和家庭关系建模。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Feb;22(1):93-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00840.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
8
Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the Brazilian version of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale.巴西版沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表的适应性与跨文化验证
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 May-Jun;61(3):209-14. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.03.209.
9
The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: a preliminary study.青少年生活满意度量表的效度及其与单项目生活满意度测量方法的比较:一项初步研究。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Dec;25(12):3173-3180. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
10
Initial validation of the Chinese Quality of Life Questionnaire-Intellectual Disabilities (CQOL-ID): a cultural perspective.中文生活质量问卷-智力障碍(CQOL-ID)的初步验证:文化视角。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Jun;55(6):572-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01412.x. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of search for meaning in life assessment tools: highlighting the need for a quest for significance scale.对生活意义评估工具搜索的系统评价:强调对意义探索量表的需求。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 24;16:1513720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1513720. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-national measurement invariance of the Purpose in Life Test in seven Latin American countries.生命意义测试在七个拉丁美洲国家的跨国测量不变性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:974133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974133. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychological factors and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury.
心理因素与脊髓损伤后死亡率的关系。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Sep;43(5):667-675. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1690766. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Health-related quality-of-life among patients with premature ovarian insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.患有卵巢早衰的患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):19-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02326-2. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Longitudinal study of social participation and well-being among persons with spinal cord injury and their partners (pro-WELL).脊髓损伤患者及其伴侣社会参与和幸福感的纵向研究(亲幸福研究)
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 25;7(1):e011597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011597.
6
Quality of data in multiethnic health surveys.多民族健康调查中的数据质量。
Public Health Rep. 2001;116 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):223-43. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.S1.223.