Suppr超能文献

[眼震电图自动和手动测定参数的一致性]

[Agreement of automatically and manually determined parameters of the electronystagmogram].

作者信息

Keck W

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1983 Oct;62(10):476-80.

PMID:6689048
Abstract

Prerequisite for clinical use of programs for automatic analysis of nystagmus is a similar accuracy in determining parameters of electronystagmograms in comparison with manual evaluation. For examination of accuracy and reliability of our program NYSLYS, we compared maximal values of the slow phase velocity (SPV) and the number of beats in 10 s of responses from thermal tests, with 100 patients with equilibrium disturbances. The average difference between the automatically and manually evaluated values for SPV and the number of beats in 10 s is in the range of +/- 15%. Correlation coefficients are 0.97 for SPV and 0.95 for the number of beats in 10 s. Similar correlation coefficients are obtained for the ratio of responses after left and right ear stimulation. These results show that our automatic analysis can replace tedious manual evaluation in most cases. In addition the temporal course of SPV is obtained as a good aid in the judgement of nystagmus. Automatic analysis, however, cannot fully replace the ability to examine electronystagmograms. Especially if curves are disturbed by many artifacts or in cases with very irregular reactions the original electronystagmogram must be considered, too.

摘要

眼球震颤自动分析程序临床应用的前提条件是,与人工评估相比,在确定眼震电图参数方面具有相似的准确性。为了检验我们的NYSLYS程序的准确性和可靠性,我们将100名平衡功能障碍患者热试验10秒反应中的慢相速度(SPV)最大值和眼跳次数与人工评估结果进行了比较。SPV和10秒内眼跳次数的自动评估值与人工评估值之间的平均差异在±15%范围内。SPV的相关系数为0.97,10秒内眼跳次数的相关系数为0.95。左右耳刺激后反应的比率也获得了相似的相关系数。这些结果表明,我们的自动分析在大多数情况下可以取代繁琐的人工评估。此外,SPV的时间进程有助于眼震的判断。然而,自动分析不能完全取代检查眼震电图的能力。特别是当曲线受到许多伪迹干扰或反应非常不规则时,也必须考虑原始的眼震电图。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验