Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice urine samples.

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis is frequently overlooked as a cause of dysuria and urinary frequency in general practice patients.

AIM

This study set out to determine the impact of performing chlamydial antigen detection on sterile pyuria samples from patients aged 16-65 years and which were submitted to a hospital microbiology laboratory by general practitioners in the Winchester health district for routine microbiological investigations.

METHOD

Chlamydial antigen detection was performed by enzyme immunoassay and direct immunofluorescence. The cost of performing the test was estimated. In the first year of the study (1991) questionnaires were sent to general practitioners whose patients had a positive test result.

RESULTS

A total of 1025 samples of sterile pyuria were received at the laboratory between January 1991 and March 1993. Chlamydial antigen was detected in 54 samples (5%); 22 men and 32 women aged between 16 and 57 years (mean 25 years). The detection rate was highest in the 16-20 years age group (22% of men had a positive sample and 7% of women). Completed questionnaires from 27 general practitioners revealed that 59% of their patients were referred to the genitourinary clinic for treatment and contact tracing. The others were treated by the general practitioner. The cost of the screening programme per cure in this population was estimated to be 246 pounds.

CONCLUSION

C trachomatis is a significant pathogen which may go unrecognized and untreated. The cost, medically and financially, of screening for this pathogen and treating infected patients and contacts is likely to be less than ignoring it, particularly if screening is confined to the 16-30 years age group. General practitioners should consider the diagnosis of chlamydial infection in young adult patients with sterile pyuria, and microbiology laboratories should screen sterile pyuria samples for chlamydial antigen.