Suppr超能文献

衡量残疾情况——自我评估与服务提供者评估结果是否可比?

Measuring disability--do self-ratings and service provider ratings compare?

作者信息

Kivelä S L

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90053-5.

Abstract

The assessment of disability in open care is often made by questionnaire-based ratings. In using such ratings, researchers should be aware of the similarities and differences between these criteria and those used by the health care personnel. This report shows that the level of agreement between the questionnaire-based and the provider ratings was not very high for housework. In using dichotomous scales, the overall percentage of cases in which there was matching was 77% for cooking activity and 64% for cleaning activity. The levels of agreement between the questionnaire-based and the provider ratings were high for the more basic self-care activities. In using quadritomous scales, the percentage of cases in which there was total agreement between these two measurements were 94-97% for the activities of dressing, eating and daily washing. The more complex self-care activities, i.e. bathing and sauna, showed a lower proportion of complete agreement than the three basic activities. The level of total agreement for bathing and sauna was 84%.

摘要

在开放式护理中,残疾评估通常通过基于问卷的评分来进行。在使用此类评分时,研究人员应了解这些标准与医护人员所用标准之间的异同。本报告表明,对于家务劳动,基于问卷的评分与提供者评分之间的一致性水平不是很高。在使用二分制量表时,烹饪活动中匹配的病例总体百分比为77%,清洁活动为64%。对于更基本的自我护理活动,基于问卷的评分与提供者评分之间的一致性水平较高。在使用四分制量表时,穿衣、进食和日常洗漱活动中这两种测量完全一致的病例百分比为94%-97%。与三项基本活动相比,更复杂的自我护理活动,即洗澡和桑拿,完全一致的比例较低。洗澡和桑拿的完全一致水平为84%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验