Dorevitch M I, Cossar R M, Bailey F J, Bisset T, Lewis S J, Wise L A, MacLennan W J
University Department of Geriatric Medicine, City Hospital, Edinburgh, U.K.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jul;45(7):791-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90057-t.
To compare the accuracy of self-ratings with informant-ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly, 150 elderly patients attending a geriatric day hospital (GDH) and their formal and informal community carers were administered a questionnaire about their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Direct observation of the patients' performance by therapists at the GDH was used as a standard, after the reliability and validity of this approach had been evaluated. Self-ratings were shown to be more accurate and less biased than informant-ratings, both for individual ADL and overall functional capacity. The accuracy of all ratings tended to be greater for less complex or physically demanding ADL, and informants tended to consistently underestimate functional capacity. The concurrent validity of the adapted Barthel Index in a self-report format was also demonstrated. Wherever possible, information concerning the physical functional capacity of an elderly subject should in the first instance be sought from the subject himself, as the quality of such information may be superior to that of his carers.
为比较老年人自我评定与知情者评定身体功能能力的准确性,对150名在老年日间医院(GDH)就诊的老年患者及其正式和非正式社区护理人员进行了关于日常生活活动(ADL)能力的问卷调查。在评估了这种方法的信效度之后,将GDH治疗师对患者表现的直接观察作为标准。结果显示,无论是个体ADL还是整体功能能力,自我评定都比知情者评定更准确且偏差更小。对于复杂程度较低或体力要求较低的ADL,所有评定的准确性往往更高,而且知情者往往会持续低估功能能力。还证明了自报告格式的改良巴氏指数的同时效度。只要有可能,应首先从老年人自身获取有关其身体功能能力的信息,因为此类信息的质量可能优于其护理人员提供的信息。