Suppr超能文献

是否进行导尿?一种基于决策理论的方法。

To catheterise or not to catheterise? An approach based on decision theory.

作者信息

Macartney F, Douglas J, Spiegelhalter D

出版信息

Br Heart J. 1984 Mar;51(3):330-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.3.330.

Abstract

To determine whether or not patients require cardiac catheterisation before surgery a computer based mathematical model was constructed based on decision theory. The model was specifically applied to sick infants under 3 months of age with suspected coarctation of the aorta, and a three way sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the effects on the model of changes in the probabilities that underlie the decision itself. The optimal decision (that with the greater survival rate) was moved away from cardiac catheterisation to confirm the diagnosis towards operating without cardiac catheterisation by the following factors: a higher probability of survival of operation both in the presence and absence of coarctation; a higher probability of survival if there was no coarctation and no operation performed; a lower sensitivity of catheterisation; a greater incremental risk of operation resulting from previous catheterisation; and a higher relative risk of catheterisation in patients without as opposed to with coarctation. Factors that tended significantly to move the decision towards catheterisation to rule out coarctation rather than neither to operate nor to catheterise were: a lower risk of surgery for coarctation if present; a higher risk of failing to operate on a patient who had coarctation; a high specificity of cardiac catheterisation; a lower incrementation of surgical risk by previous cardiac catheterisation; and a lower relative risk of catheterisation if coarctation was absent. In this institution, the model argues strongly against cardiac catheterisation in the great majority of sick infants with coarctation.

摘要

为了确定患者在手术前是否需要进行心导管插入术,基于决策理论构建了一个计算机化的数学模型。该模型专门应用于疑似主动脉缩窄的3个月以下患病婴儿,并进行了三向敏感性分析,以评估构成决策本身的概率变化对模型的影响。最佳决策(即生存率更高的决策)从通过心导管插入术来确诊转向不进行心导管插入术直接手术,这是由以下因素导致的:无论有无主动脉缩窄,手术存活的概率更高;如果没有主动脉缩窄且不进行手术,存活概率更高;心导管插入术的敏感性较低;先前的心导管插入术导致手术的增量风险更大;与有主动脉缩窄的患者相比,无主动脉缩窄患者心导管插入术的相对风险更高。倾向于显著地将决策转向进行心导管插入术以排除主动脉缩窄而不是既不手术也不进行心导管插入术的因素有:如果存在主动脉缩窄,手术风险较低;对患有主动脉缩窄的患者不进行手术的失败风险较高;心导管插入术的特异性较高;先前的心导管插入术导致的手术风险增加较低;如果不存在主动脉缩窄,心导管插入术的相对风险较低。在本机构中,该模型强烈反对对绝大多数患有主动脉缩窄的患病婴儿进行心导管插入术。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic logic.诊断逻辑。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Nov 21;295(6609):1325-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6609.1325.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验