Suppr超能文献

双重对比钡灌肠检查中洗肠与非洗肠(聚乙二醇电解质散)准备方法的比较

Washout versus non-washout (Picolax) preparation for double-contrast barium enemas.

作者信息

Bartram C I, Mootoosamy I M, Lim I K

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 1984 Mar;35(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(84)80020-3.

Abstract

A non-washout preparation using Picolax in 40 patients, compared with a standard method using washouts in 38 patients, showed no significant difference in the contamination by residual formed or semiliquid faeces, although Picolax was associated with significantly more contamination due to adherent faeces and mucus. The overall differences in contamination were most marked in the transverse colon. Picolax also affected the smooth muscle tone of the bowel wall, causing an increase in 'mucosal crinkling'.

摘要

40名患者使用聚乙二醇电解质散进行非清洗准备,与38名患者采用清洗法的标准方法相比,虽然聚乙二醇电解质散导致更多的黏附粪便和黏液污染,但在残留成形或半液体粪便污染方面无显著差异。污染的总体差异在横结肠最为明显。聚乙二醇电解质散还影响肠壁平滑肌张力,导致“黏膜皱襞”增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验