血清铁的测定；两种方法的比较：原子吸收法和无需去蛋白的邻二氮菲法（作者译）
[Determination of serum iron; a comparison of two methods: atomic absorption and bathophenanthroline without deproteinisation (author's transl)].
作者信息
Lauber K
出版信息
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1978 May;16(5):315-6.
UNLABELLED
Two methods for the assay of serum iron are compared; determination by atomic absorption after deproteinisation, and spectrophotometric determination after liberation of the iron by a detergent, reduction with dithionite, and chelation with bathophenanthroline disulfonate, without deproteinisation.
RESULTS
Regression: y = 0.996 x --0.41 (s: atomic absorption; y: bathophenanthroline method; mumol/1 Fe; r = 0.986. Precision (CV) for a series of identical samples with 14.3 mumol/1: 2.0% for atomic absorption and 1.3% for bathophenanthroline.
未标记
比较了两种血清铁测定方法；一种是去蛋白后用原子吸收法测定，另一种是在不进行去蛋白的情况下，用去污剂释放铁、连二亚硫酸盐还原以及与4,7-二苯基-1,10-菲啰啉二磺酸螯合后用分光光度法测定。
结果
回归方程：y = 0.996x - 0.41（s：原子吸收法；y：4,7-二苯基-1,10-菲啰啉法；μmol/L铁；r = 0.986。对于一系列浓度为14.3 μmol/L的相同样品，精密度（CV）：原子吸收法为2.0%，4,7-二苯基-1,10-菲啰啉法为1.3%。
Zotero 插件