• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期患者营养支持中的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in the nutritional support of the terminal patient.

作者信息

Boisaubin E V

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1984 May;84(5):529-31.

PMID:6715748
Abstract

Nutritional support is well accepted medically, morally, and legally and should be provided to all patients with hope of recovery. In the responsive terminal patient, nutritional support should be continued if the patient desires it and might benefit from it indirectly. Oral feeding is the easiest and safest method. Enteral feeding may present some risks, and hyperalimentation may not commonly be indicated because of the risks, costs, and restrictions placed upon the patient. The patient's wishes, when known, should have the highest priority, and benefits should always outweigh the risks. In the unresponsive terminal patient, there would appear to be no advantage in continuing nutritional support, since no benefit can occur. The dietitian can play an essential role in planning nutritional support with the health team for the still responsive patient and help the family make the best medical and moral decision when the patient is unresponsive and death approaches.

摘要

营养支持在医学、道德和法律上都得到了广泛认可,应该提供给所有有望康复的患者。对于有反应的终末期患者,如果患者有需求且可能间接从中受益,就应继续提供营养支持。经口喂养是最简单、最安全的方法。肠内喂养可能存在一些风险,而由于风险、成本以及对患者的限制,通常不建议进行胃肠外营养。在已知患者意愿的情况下,应将其意愿置于最高优先级,且益处应始终大于风险。对于无反应的终末期患者,继续营养支持似乎没有任何益处,因为不会产生任何效果。营养师在与医疗团队为仍有反应的患者规划营养支持方面可以发挥重要作用,并在患者无反应且接近死亡时,帮助家属做出最佳的医疗和道德决策。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in the nutritional support of the terminal patient.晚期患者营养支持中的伦理问题。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1984 May;84(5):529-31.
2
Interpreting a moral right. Ethical dilemmas in nutritional support for terminally ill patients.解读一项道德权利。晚期患者营养支持中的伦理困境。
Prof Nurse. 1993 Mar;8(6):380-3.
3
Ethical issues in nutritional support nursing. Withholding and withdrawing nutritional support.营养支持护理中的伦理问题。停止和撤除营养支持。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;24(2):427-36.
4
[Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].[临终关怀/姑息治疗中的关键伦理讨论]
Acta Med Croatica. 2008 Dec;62(5):447-54.
5
[Nutritional support in terminally ill situation. Ethical dilemmas].[终末期患者的营养支持。伦理困境]
An Med Interna. 2003 Aug;20(8):434-7.
6
Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation: ethical principles and guidelines for terminal weaning.机械通气的撤离:终末期撤机的伦理原则与指南
Am J Crit Care. 1993 May;2(3):217-23.
7
Legal and ethical guidelines for physicians in geriatric terminal care.老年临终关怀中医师的法律与伦理准则。
Geriatrics. 1988 Aug;43(8):69-70, 74-5.
8
The A.M.A. statement on tube feeding: an ethical analysis.
America (NY). 1986 Nov 22;155(15):321-323,331.
9
[Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment--from the bioethical and legal viewpoints].[从生物伦理和法律视角看生命延长治疗的 withhold 与 withdraw] (注:这里“withhold”和“withdraw”在医学语境下准确含义需结合上下文进一步明确,大致可理解为“停止给予”和“撤销”等意思)
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2006 Dec;33 Suppl 2:267-9.
10
The concept of futility. Patients do not have a right to demand medically useless treatment. Counterpoint.无效治疗的概念。患者无权要求进行医学上无用的治疗。相反观点。
Health Prog. 1993 Dec;74(10):28-32.