Guzick D S, Daikoku N H, Kaltreider D F
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 May;63(5):645-50.
Multivariate models have great potential value in enhancing the understanding of why some pregnancies have poor outcomes. Recently, such models have been advocated as a basis for predictive scoring systems that attempt to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. In this report the usefulness of such an approach was assessed by studying the predictability of preterm delivery at The Johns Hopkins Hospital during 1980, using a multiple logistic model. Choosing a cutoff point (or probability of preterm delivery) of 10%, 697 of 2865 patients were placed in the high-risk group. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the model, as applied to this select population, were 62.2, 79.4, and 22.7%, respectively. Thus, only 23% of patients predicted to have preterm deliveries in fact delivered preterm. The predictive value could have been improved by increasing the cutoff point, but only at the expense of markedly reducing the sensitivity of the model. It was concluded that the potential value of multivariate analyses of pregnancy outcome as a predictive, risk-classification technique is limited. Nevertheless, such studies may aid the clinical evaluation of each individual patient by providing a better understanding of the etiologies of poor outcome.
多变量模型在加深对某些妊娠结局不良原因的理解方面具有巨大的潜在价值。最近,此类模型已被倡导作为预测评分系统的基础,该系统试图将患者分为高危和低危组。在本报告中,通过使用多元逻辑模型研究1980年约翰霍普金斯医院早产的可预测性,评估了这种方法的实用性。选择早产的临界值(或概率)为10%,2865名患者中有697名被归入高危组。应用于该特定人群时,该模型的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值分别为62.2%、79.4%和22.7%。因此,实际上只有23%被预测会早产的患者确实早产了。通过提高临界值可以提高预测价值,但这只能以显著降低模型的敏感性为代价。得出的结论是,作为一种预测性风险分类技术,妊娠结局的多变量分析的潜在价值是有限的。然而,此类研究通过更好地理解不良结局的病因,可能有助于对每个患者进行临床评估。