Carew T J, Hawkins R D, Abrams T W, Kandel E R
J Neurosci. 1984 May;4(5):1217-24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-05-01217.1984.
In 1949, D. O. Hebb proposed a novel mechanism for producing changes in the strength of synapses that could account for associative learning. According to Hebb , the strength of a synapse might increase when the use of that synapse contributes to the generation of action potentials in a postsynaptic neuron. Thus, an essential feature of this postulate is that action potentials must occur in both a postsynaptic cell and a presynaptic cell for associative synaptic changes to occur. We have directly tested Hebb 's postulate in Aplysia at identified synapses which are known to exhibit a temporally specific increase in efficacy during a cellular analogue of differential conditioning. We find that the mechanism postulated by Hebb is neither necessary nor sufficient to produce the associative change in synaptic strength that underlies conditioning in Aplysia. In contrast, impulse activity in the presynaptic cell must be paired with facilitatory input, supporting the hypothesis that the temporal specificity of classical conditioning in Aplysia can be accounted for by activity-dependent amplification of presynaptic facilitation.
1949年,D. O. 赫布提出了一种新颖的机制,用于产生突触强度的变化,这种变化可以解释联想学习。根据赫布的理论,当突触的使用有助于在突触后神经元中产生动作电位时,该突触的强度可能会增加。因此,这一假设的一个基本特征是,为了发生联想性突触变化,动作电位必须在突触后细胞和突触前细胞中都出现。我们已经在海兔中对已知在差异条件作用的细胞类似物过程中表现出时间特异性效能增加的特定突触,直接测试了赫布的假设。我们发现,赫布假设的机制对于产生海兔条件作用基础的突触强度的联想性变化既不是必需的,也不是充分的。相反,突触前细胞中的冲动活动必须与易化性输入配对,这支持了这样一种假设,即海兔经典条件作用的时间特异性可以通过突触前易化的活动依赖性放大来解释。