Cassileth B R, Lusk E J, Strouse T B, Bodenheimer B J
Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jul;101(1):105-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105.
Public education, legislative action, and medical advances have failed to deter patients from seeking unorthodox treatments for cancer and other diseases. To study this phenomenon, we interviewed 304 cancer center inpatients and 356 patients under the care of unorthodox practitioners. A concomitant survey of unorthodox practitioners documented their backgrounds and practices. Eight percent of all patients studied never received any conventional therapy, and 54% of patients on conventional therapy also used unorthodox treatments. Forty percent of patients abandoned conventional care entirely after adopting alternative methods. Patients interviewed did not conform to the stereotype of poorly educated, end-stage patients who had exhausted conventional treatment. Practitioners also deviated from the traditional portrait: Of 138 unorthodox practitioners studied, 60% were physicians(M.D.s). Patients are attracted to therapeutic alternatives that reflect social emphasis on personal responsibility, pollution and nutrition, and that move away from perceived deficiencies in conventional medical care.
公共教育、立法行动和医学进步都未能阻止患者寻求癌症及其他疾病的非正统治疗方法。为研究这一现象,我们采访了304名癌症中心住院患者以及356名接受非正统治疗师治疗的患者。同时,对非正统治疗师进行的一项调查记录了他们的背景和治疗方法。在所有接受研究的患者中,8%从未接受过任何传统治疗,而接受传统治疗的患者中有54%也使用非正统治疗方法。40%的患者在采用替代方法后完全放弃了传统治疗。接受采访的患者并不符合那种教育程度低、处于疾病末期且已用尽传统治疗方法的患者刻板印象。治疗师也与传统形象有所不同:在接受研究的138名非正统治疗师中,60%是医生(医学博士)。患者被那些反映社会对个人责任、污染和营养的重视,且摆脱了传统医疗护理中被认为存在的不足的治疗选择所吸引。